WoRMS name details

Acartia (Acanthacartia) intermedia (Poppe, 1885)

149748  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:149748)

 unaccepted
Species
Acartia bifilosa intermedia (Poppe, 1885) · alternative representation (synonym)
Acartia intermedia (Poppe, 1885) · alternative representation (synonym)
Dias intermedius Poppe, 1885 · unaccepted (synonym)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(of Dias intermedius Poppe, 1885) Poppe, S.A. (1885). Die freilebenden Copepoden des Jadebusens. I. Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins zu Bremen 9:167-206, pls. 4-7. [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Walter, T.C.; Boxshall, G. (2024). World of Copepods Database. Acartia (Acanthacartia) intermedia (Poppe, 1885). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=149748 on 2024-04-18
Date
action
by
2005-03-30 12:51:50Z
created
2008-02-05 23:43:00Z
changed
2009-11-29 12:55:03Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description  (of Dias intermedius Poppe, 1885) Poppe, S.A. (1885). Die freilebenden Copepoden des Jadebusens. I. Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins zu Bremen 9:167-206, pls. 4-7. [details]  OpenAccess publication 

basis of record van Breemen, P.J. (1906). Mariene copepoden [Marine copepods]. <i>Fauna van Nederland</i>, 1. E.J. Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands. 31 pp. (look up in IMIS[details]   

source of synonymy Hirst, A.G. & E. Castro-Longoria. (1998). Acartia bifilosa (Copepoda: Calanoida): a clarification of the species and its varieties inermis and intermedia. <em>Journal of Plankton Research.</em> 20(6) : 1119-1130. [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From other sources
Synonymy Individuals previously reported and also deposited in museum collections as A. bifilosa var. inermis and var. intermedia are shown to be similar to A. bifilosa with respect to characteristics previously used for classification. A single unified species, A. bifilosa (Giesbrecht), is suggested here, with some of the variation in its form being detailed. We believe errors may have occurred because of the angle from which features were previously examined, and because some of the features could be missed using light microscopy. [details]