WoRMS taxon details

Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930

129192  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:129192)

accepted
Genus
Pareurythoe japonica Gustafson, 1930 (type by subsequent designation)

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

  1. Species Pareurythoe borealis (M. Sars, 1862)
  2. Species Pareurythoe californica (Johnson, 1897)
  3. Species Pareurythoe chilensis (Kinberg, 1857)
  4. Species Pareurythoe gracilis Gustafson, 1930
  5. Species Pareurythoe japonica Gustafson, 1930
  6. Species Pareurythoe pitipanaensis De Silva, 1965
  7. Species Pareurythoe americana Hartman, 1951 accepted as Cryptonome americana (Hartman, 1951) (unaccepted > superseded combination, superseded original combination)
  8. Species Pareurythoe elongata (Treadwell, 1931) accepted as Cryptonome elongata (Treadwell, 1931) (unaccepted > superseded combination, superseded subsequent combination)
  9. Species Pareurythoe parvecarunculata (Horst, 1912) accepted as Cryptonome parvecarunculata (Horst, 1912) (superseded recombination)
  10. Species Pareurythoe spirocirrata (Essenberg, 1917) accepted as Eurythoe spirocirrata Essenberg, 1917 (unaccepted > superseded combination, superseded subsequent combination)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Gustafson, Gunnar. (1930). Anatomische studien über die polychäten-familien Amphinomidae und Euphrosynidae. <em>Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala.</em> 12: 305-471.
page(s): 308 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
Taxonomic remark Tovar-Hernández et al (2024: 548) comment as follows: "Among Amphinomin genera, Pareurythoe is very similar to Cryptonome...  
Taxonomic remark Tovar-Hernández et al (2024: 548) comment as follows: "Among Amphinomin genera, Pareurythoe is very similar to Cryptonome because both have chaetiger 1 dorsally incomplete, a small caruncle, and branchiae along most body chaetigers. However, there are two consistent differences between them. In Pareurythoe the median antenna is shorter than the caruncle, and first branchiae have a few filaments, whereas in Cryptonome the median antenna is as long as, or longer than caruncle, and first branchiae have many filaments. Another interesting difference is ecological, because the species of Pareurythoe have been found in sediments, whereas most Cryptonome species have been found in decaying wood" [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129192 on 2024-04-18
Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2015-11-22 23:08:05Z
changed
2020-08-21 10:23:32Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Gustafson, Gunnar. (1930). Anatomische studien über die polychäten-familien Amphinomidae und Euphrosynidae. <em>Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala.</em> 12: 305-471.
page(s): 308 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

additional source Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. <em>Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series.</em> 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf [details]   

additional source Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS[details]   

status source Borda, Elizabeth; Yáñez-Rivera, Beatriz; Ochoa, Gabriela M.; Kudenov, Jerry D.; Sanchez-Ortiz, Carlos; Schulze, Anja; Rouse, Greg W. (2015). Revamping Amphinomidae (Annelida: Amphinomida), with the inclusion of Notopygos. <em>Zoologica Scripta.</em> 44(3): 324-333., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12099
page(s): 330; note: included in Amphinominae [details]   

status source Tovar-Hernández, María Ana.; González-Vallejo, Norma Emilia; Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2024). Cryptonome beatrizae n. sp., from drifting wood in Western Mexico, with remarks on Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930 (Annelida, Amphinomidae). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 5424(5): 535-553., available online at https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5424.5.3
page(s): 548; note: taxonomic remarks on distinction from Cryptonome [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

subsequent type designation Hartman, Olga. (1959). Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of the World. Parts 1 and 2. <em>Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Paper.</em> 23: 1-628.
page(s): 137 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Tovar-Hernández et al (2024: 548) comment as follows: "Among Amphinomin genera, Pareurythoe is very similar to Cryptonome because both have chaetiger 1 dorsally incomplete, a small caruncle, and branchiae along most body chaetigers. However, there are two consistent differences between them. In Pareurythoe the median antenna is shorter than the caruncle, and first branchiae have a few filaments, whereas in Cryptonome the median antenna is as long as, or longer than caruncle, and first branchiae have many filaments. Another interesting difference is ecological, because the species of Pareurythoe have been found in sediments, whereas most Cryptonome species have been found in decaying wood" [details]