WoRMS name details

Orbinia (Phylo) Kinberg, 1866

152446  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:152446)

 unaccepted
Subgenus
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomy Pettibone (1957, 1963) considered the genus Phylo Kinberg, 1866 as a subgenus of Orbinia Quatrefages, 1866. However, most...  
Taxonomy Pettibone (1957, 1963) considered the genus Phylo Kinberg, 1866 as a subgenus of Orbinia Quatrefages, 1866. However, most authors considered the two genera as being valid and distinct. The relationship between the two genera is very close, but it is not completely solved (Bleidorn, 2005). [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2019). World Polychaeta database. Orbinia (Phylo) Kinberg, 1866. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=152446 on 2019-12-15
Date
action
by
2005-04-11 09:31:37Z
created
2006-07-17 10:41:03Z
changed
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2013-07-13 23:21:39Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


basis of record Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1996). Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta [Annelida, bristleworms, Polychaeta]. <em>2nd revised ed. The fauna of Germany and adjacent seas with their characteristics and ecology, 58. Gustav Fischer: Jena, Germany. ISBN 3-437-35038-2.</em> 648 pp. (look up in IMIS[details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

status source Pettibone, Marian H. (1957). North American genera of the family Orbiniidae (Annelida: Polychaeta), with descriptions of new species. <em>Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.</em> 47(5): 159-167., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/39753529
page(s): 160 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Pettibone (1957, 1963) considered the genus Phylo Kinberg, 1866 as a subgenus of Orbinia Quatrefages, 1866. However, most authors considered the two genera as being valid and distinct. The relationship between the two genera is very close, but it is not completely solved (Bleidorn, 2005). [details]