WoRMS name details

Stelospongos Schmidt, 1870

184906  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:184906)

 unaccepted (nomen nudum)
Genus
Stelospongos friabilis Hyatt, 1877 accepted as Fasciospongia friabilis (Hyatt, 1877) (type by subsequent designation)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Schmidt, O. (1870). Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): iii-iv, 1-88, pls I-VI. [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Taxonomy Stelospongos is a nomen nudum as no species were named when it was first described. Any subsequent type species...  
Taxonomy Stelospongos is a nomen nudum as no species were named when it was first described. Any subsequent type species designations (e.g. by de Laubenfels) are probably invalid. [details]
Van Soest, R.W.M.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Rützler, K.; de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Hajdu, E.; Pisera, A.B.; Manconi, R.; Schönberg, C.; Klautau, M.; Kelly, M.; Vacelet, J.; Dohrmann, M.; Díaz, M.-C.; Cárdenas, P.; Carballo, J.L.; Ríos, P.; Downey, R.; Morrow, C.C. (2020). World Porifera Database. Stelospongos Schmidt, 1870. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=184906 on 2020-10-27
Date
action
by
2005-12-12 17:12:35Z
created
2006-02-01 19:04:21Z
changed
2010-05-21 14:30:30Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Schmidt, O. (1870). Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): iii-iv, 1-88, pls I-VI. [details]  OpenAccess publication 

source of synonymy Bergquist, P.R. (1980). A revision of the supraspecific classification of the orders Dictyoceratida, Dendroceratida and Verongida (class Demospongiae). <em>New Zealand Journal of Zoology.</em> 7 (4): 443-503. [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Stelospongos is a nomen nudum as no species were named when it was first described. Any subsequent type species designations (e.g. by de Laubenfels) are probably invalid. [details]