WoRMS name details

Anomia nobilis Reeve, 1859

207752  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:207752)

 unaccepted
Species
marine
Reeve, L.A. (1859). Monograph of the genus <i>Anomia</i>. In: <i>Conchologia Iconica</i>, vol. 11, pl. 1-8 and unpaginated text. L. Reeve & Co., London. , available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8183432
page(s): pl. 5, species 23 [details]   
Type locality contained in Hawaiian part of the North Pacific Ocean  
type locality contained in Hawaiian part of the North Pacific Ocean (origin: alien[details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2020). MolluscaBase. Anomia nobilis Reeve, 1859. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=207752 on 2020-10-25
Date
action
by
1997-11-13 08:24:17Z
created
2010-11-18 14:08:23Z
changed
2010-11-19 08:53:28Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Reeve, L.A. (1859). Monograph of the genus <i>Anomia</i>. In: <i>Conchologia Iconica</i>, vol. 11, pl. 1-8 and unpaginated text. L. Reeve & Co., London. , available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8183432
page(s): pl. 5, species 23 [details]   

context source (Introduced species) Molnar, J. L.; Gamboa, R. L.; Revenga, C.; Spalding, M. D. (2008). Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. <em>Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.</em> 6(9): 485-492., available online at https://www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationPractices/Marine/Pages/marineinvasives.aspx [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

basis of record Huber, M. (2010). Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world's marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. 901 pp., 1 CD-ROM. (look up in IMIS[details]   
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
 

From editor or global species database
Introduced species remark Reported as introduced by Eldredge & Smith (2001) on the grounds that "It is unlikely to have been missed in collections of some two or three decades earlier [than its description in 1859]. It is thus another example of a species being first described from the site of introduction." However there are hardly any reports elsewhere (except in the Red Sea y Lamy, 1938)and Oliver, 1992) and this therefore requires confirmation.  [details]