WoRMS taxon details

Hydractinia arge (Clarke, 1882)

284840  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:284840)

accepted
Species
Stylactis arge Clarke, 1882 · unaccepted (basionym)
marine, terrestrial
(of Stylactis arge Clarke, 1882) Clarke, S. F. 1882. New and interesting hydroids from Chesapeake Bay. Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History 3: 135-142, pls 7-9., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7751215
page(s): 138, figs 18-20 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Taxonomic remark This species was not included in the molecular phylogeny of Miglietta & Cunningham (2012), the correct genus can thus not...  
Taxonomic remark This species was not included in the molecular phylogeny of Miglietta & Cunningham (2012), the correct genus can thus not be identified. Due to its occurrence on seagrasses, it seems likely that it belongs to Stylactis.  [details]
Schuchert, P. (2024). World Hydrozoa Database. Hydractinia arge (Clarke, 1882). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=284840 on 2024-04-23
Date
action
by
2008-01-16 10:35:54Z
created
2009-09-30 07:43:55Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description  (of Stylactis arge Clarke, 1882) Clarke, S. F. 1882. New and interesting hydroids from Chesapeake Bay. Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History 3: 135-142, pls 7-9., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7751215
page(s): 138, figs 18-20 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

basis of record Vervoort, W.; Schuchert, P. & van der Land, J. (2000-2007). as a contribution to UNESCO-IOC Register of Marine Organisms. (look up in IMIS[details]   
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Biology colonial [details]

Taxonomic remark This species was not included in the molecular phylogeny of Miglietta & Cunningham (2012), the correct genus can thus not be identified. Due to its occurrence on seagrasses, it seems likely that it belongs to Stylactis.  [details]