WoRMS name details

Tuba Renier, 1807

326061  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:326061)

 unaccepted (although in an unavailable work (Opinion 427), Tuba, T. divisa, and some other names were not rejected until Opinion 436.)
Genus

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

  1. Species Tuba divisa Renier, 1807 accepted as Myxicola infundibulum (Montagu, 1808) (unaccepted > unavailable name, published in an otherwise unavailable work (ICZN Opinion 427 of 1956, rejected in Opinion 436)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
feminine
Renier, S.A. (1807). Tavole per servire alla classificazione e conoscenza degli animali, [1] + pl. I-VIII. Note: work placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Works in Zoological Nomenclature by ICZN Opinion 427 (1956). Padova (Tipografia del Seminario)
page(s): vi (fide Meneghini 1847); note: although in an unavailable work, Tuba and some other names were not rejected until the supplementary ICZN Opinion 436 [details]   
Homonymy Tuba Renier, 1807 is a rejected name (Opinion 436) but if available it would have been senior homonym to the gastropod...  
Homonymy Tuba Renier, 1807 is a rejected name (Opinion 436) but if available it would have been senior homonym to the gastropod genus Tuba I. Lea, 1833 (Mathildidae) in Mollusca. There are further Tuba genus names but they are dealt with in Opinion 436 so are resolved. Note that Meneghini published Renier's Tuba again in 1847. [details]

Status Tuba Renier is clearly a senior synonym of Myxicola if Tuba is an available name. However, Tuba Renier (1807) is in an...  
Status Tuba Renier is clearly a senior synonym of Myxicola if Tuba is an available name. However, Tuba Renier (1807) is in an unavailable work and also was explicitly rejected as a name in Opinion 436. This work of Renier [said to be eighty synoptic tables covering five of the eleven classes into which Renier divided the animal kingdom] is not only unavailable according to an ICZN Opinion, it is also unavailable for viewing outside of where the only copy is held in Padua Italy. The names in Renier should have been ignored as unpublished but some were adopted by others, and Sherborn indexed them which gave them further debatable legitimacy. Later Meneghini (1847) edited and published a version of Renier's work in which Tuba Renier is mentioned, but by then, even if regarded as a new name validly published, it had become a junior homonym to the Tuba of Lea 1833 so the 1847 usage by Meneghini cannot affect other names. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Tuba Renier, 1807. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=326061 on 2024-04-19
Date
action
by
2008-03-14 12:50:56Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2023-02-24 01:44:41Z
changed
2023-02-24 08:11:35Z
changed
2023-02-26 07:18:09Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Renier, S.A. (1807). Tavole per servire alla classificazione e conoscenza degli animali, [1] + pl. I-VIII. Note: work placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Works in Zoological Nomenclature by ICZN Opinion 427 (1956). Padova (Tipografia del Seminario)
page(s): vi (fide Meneghini 1847); note: although in an unavailable work, Tuba and some other names were not rejected until the supplementary ICZN Opinion 436 [details]   

redescription Renier, Stefano Andrea [posthumously as edited by Meneghini, Guiseppe]. (1847). Osservazioni postume di Zoologia Adriatica del Professore Stefano Andrea Renier, membro effettivo dell'Istituto Italiano, pubblicate per cura dell'I. R. Istituto Veneto de Scienze, Lettere ed Arti a studio del membro effettivo Prof. G. Meneghini. pp. ix, (1), 120, (2), 16 plates. Giovanni Cecchini, Venezia.
page(s): 51, plate 9; note: Meneghini confusingly presents several name variants, one of which is as Tuba (Terebella) infundibulum, and another is Terebella infundibulum o Tuba divisa (Ren.) [details]   

status source International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (IZCN). (1956). Opinion 427. Rejection for nomenclatorial purposes of the work by Renier (S.A.) known as "Tavole per Servire alle Classificazione e Connescenza degli Animali" and commonly attributed to the year 1807 and addition to the "Official Indexed of Rejected and Invalid Names in Zoology" of certain names first used in the foregoing work or in two earlier works by the same author commonly known as the "Tavola Alfabetica" and the "Prospetto" restively [sic] and both commonly attributed to the year 1804. <em>Opinions and Declarations Rendered by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 14(11): 281–310.
note: Renier's [1807] unpublished "Tavole" is rejected for use in nomenclature [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

status source International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (IZCN). (1957). Opinion 436. Addition to the "Official Indexes of Rejected and Invalid Names in Zoology" of certain names attributed to Renier (S.A.) as from 1804 and 1807, respectively ("Opinion" supplementary to "Opinion" 427. <em>Opinions and Declarations Rendered by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 15(1): 1–24.
note: rejection of Tuba and Tuba divisa Renier, 1807 for use in nomenclature [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Homonymy Tuba Renier, 1807 is a rejected name (Opinion 436) but if available it would have been senior homonym to the gastropod genus Tuba I. Lea, 1833 (Mathildidae) in Mollusca. There are further Tuba genus names but they are dealt with in Opinion 436 so are resolved. Note that Meneghini published Renier's Tuba again in 1847. [details]

Status Tuba Renier is clearly a senior synonym of Myxicola if Tuba is an available name. However, Tuba Renier (1807) is in an unavailable work and also was explicitly rejected as a name in Opinion 436. This work of Renier [said to be eighty synoptic tables covering five of the eleven classes into which Renier divided the animal kingdom] is not only unavailable according to an ICZN Opinion, it is also unavailable for viewing outside of where the only copy is held in Padua Italy. The names in Renier should have been ignored as unpublished but some were adopted by others, and Sherborn indexed them which gave them further debatable legitimacy. Later Meneghini (1847) edited and published a version of Renier's work in which Tuba Renier is mentioned, but by then, even if regarded as a new name validly published, it had become a junior homonym to the Tuba of Lea 1833 so the 1847 usage by Meneghini cannot affect other names. [details]