WoRMS taxon details
Neonesidea amygdaloides (Brady, 1880)
460071 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:460071)
accepted
Species
Bairdia amygdaloides Brady, 1880 · unaccepted
marine, terrestrial
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomy From Maddocsk, 2013: Maddocks (1969, pp. 19–20) did not reclassify B. amygdaloides into Neonesidea, as implied by Kempf...
Taxonomy From Maddocsk, 2013: Maddocks (1969, pp. 19–20) did not reclassify B. amygdaloides into Neonesidea, as implied by Kempf (1986, p. 213). She merely suggested that the material erroneously identified under this name by Brady (1890) might include one or more species of Neonesidea. This is not a nomenclatural action." [details]
Brandão, S.N.; Antonietto, L.S; Nery, D.G.; Pereira, J.S.; Praxedes, R.A.; Santos, S.G.; Karanovic, I. (2024). World Ostracoda Database. Neonesidea amygdaloides (Brady, 1880). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=460071 on 2024-04-24
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
new combination reference
Maddocks, R. F. (1969). Revision of recent Bairdiidae (Ostracoda). <em>U. S. National Museum Bulletin.</em> 296: 1-126., available online at http://si-pddr.si.edu/jspui/bitstream/10088/10141/1/USNMB_2951969_unit.pdf [details] Available for editors [request]
status source Maddocks, R. F. (2013). New and poorly known species of <i>Neonesidea</i> (Bairdiidae, Ostracoda, Crustacea) from French Frigate Shoals, the Hawaiian Islands. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 3608(6): 457–510., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2013/f/zt03608p510.pdf [details] Available for editors [request]
status source Maddocks, R. F. (2013). New and poorly known species of <i>Neonesidea</i> (Bairdiidae, Ostracoda, Crustacea) from French Frigate Shoals, the Hawaiian Islands. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 3608(6): 457–510., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2013/f/zt03608p510.pdf [details] Available for editors [request]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy From Maddocsk, 2013: Maddocks (1969, pp. 19–20) did not reclassify B. amygdaloides into Neonesidea, as implied by Kempf (1986, p. 213). She merely suggested that the material erroneously identified under this name by Brady (1890) might include one or more species of Neonesidea. This is not a nomenclatural action." [details]