WoRMS taxon details

Neonesidea amygdaloides (Brady, 1880)

460071  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:460071)

accepted
Species
marine, terrestrial
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomy From Maddocsk, 2013: Maddocks (1969, pp. 19–20) did not reclassify B. amygdaloides into Neonesidea, as implied by Kempf...  
Taxonomy From Maddocsk, 2013: Maddocks (1969, pp. 19–20) did not reclassify B. amygdaloides into Neonesidea, as implied by Kempf (1986, p. 213). She merely suggested that the material erroneously identified under this name by Brady (1890) might include one or more species of Neonesidea. This is not a nomenclatural action." [details]
Brandão, S.N.; Antonietto, L.S; Nery, D.G.; Pereira, J.S.; Praxedes, R.A.; Santos, S.G.; Karanovic, I. (2024). World Ostracoda Database. Neonesidea amygdaloides (Brady, 1880). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=460071 on 2024-04-24
Date
action
by
2010-02-28 09:26:24Z
created
2010-03-01 10:26:02Z
checked
2010-03-02 08:34:02Z
changed
2010-03-02 08:47:06Z
checked
2016-08-23 18:56:19Z
changed
2020-05-08 12:39:16Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


new combination reference Maddocks, R. F. (1969). Revision of recent Bairdiidae (Ostracoda). <em>U. S. National Museum Bulletin.</em> 296: 1-126., available online at http://si-pddr.si.edu/jspui/bitstream/10088/10141/1/USNMB_2951969_unit.pdf [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

status source Maddocks, R. F. (2013). New and poorly known species of <i>Neonesidea</i> (Bairdiidae, Ostracoda, Crustacea) from French Frigate Shoals, the Hawaiian Islands. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 3608(6): 457–510., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2013/f/zt03608p510.pdf [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Taxonomy From Maddocsk, 2013: Maddocks (1969, pp. 19–20) did not reclassify B. amygdaloides into Neonesidea, as implied by Kempf (1986, p. 213). She merely suggested that the material erroneously identified under this name by Brady (1890) might include one or more species of Neonesidea. This is not a nomenclatural action." [details]