WoRMS name details

Coralliophila aspera (A. Adams, 1855)

709423  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:709423)

uncertain > taxon inquirendum
Species
Rhizochilus asper A. Adams, 1855 · unaccepted (original combination)
marine
(of Rhizochilus asper A. Adams, 1855) Adams, A. (1855). Descriptions of thirty-nine new species of shells, from the collection of Hugh Cuming, Esq. <em>Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London.</em> (1854) 22: 130-138, pl. 28., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/30747527
page(s): 137. [details]   
Type locality contained in Gulf of California  
type locality contained in Gulf of California [from synonym] [view taxon] [details]
Status Keen (1971) noted that no specimens of the species had been reported in recent years and said that "it may well not prove...  
Status Keen (1971) noted that no specimens of the species had been reported in recent years and said that "it may well not prove to be West American". [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Coralliophila aspera (A. Adams, 1855). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=709423 on 2024-03-29
Date
action
by
2012-10-31 16:00:42Z
created

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description  (of Rhizochilus asper A. Adams, 1855) Adams, A. (1855). Descriptions of thirty-nine new species of shells, from the collection of Hugh Cuming, Esq. <em>Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London.</em> (1854) 22: 130-138, pl. 28., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/30747527
page(s): 137. [details]   

status source Keen, A. M. (1971). Sea Shells of Tropical West America. Marine mollusks from Baja California to Peru. ed. 2. Stanford University Press. xv, 1064 pp., 22 pls.
page(s): 545 [details]   
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Status Keen (1971) noted that no specimens of the species had been reported in recent years and said that "it may well not prove to be West American". [details]