WoRMS name details
Aspalima Iredale, 1929
761899 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:761899)
unaccepted
Limopsis (Aspalima) Iredale, 1929 represented as Limopsis Sasso, 1827
Genus
Limopsis erecta Hedley & Petterd, 1906 (type by original designation)
- Species Aspalima erecta (Hedley & Petterd, 1906) accepted as Limopsis (Aspalima) erecta Hedley & Petterd, 1906 represented as Limopsis erecta Hedley & Petterd, 1906 (superseded combination)
- Species Aspalima idonea Iredale, 1929 accepted as Limopsis (Aspalima) idonea (Iredale, 1929) represented as Limopsis idonea (Iredale, 1929)
- Species Aspalima scabra (Thiele, 1912) accepted as Limopsis (Aspalima) scabra Thiele, 1912 represented as Limopsis scabra Thiele, 1912
- Species Aspalima solator Iredale, 1931 accepted as Limopsis (Aspalima) erecta Hedley & Petterd, 1906 represented as Limopsis erecta Hedley & Petterd, 1906 (junior subjective synonym)
marine
recent + fossil
Iredale, T. (1929). Mollusca from the continental shelf of eastern Australia. No 2. <em>Records of the Australian Museum.</em> 17(4): 157-189 [4 September 1929]., available online at http://australianmuseum.net.au/journal/Iredale-1929-Rec-Aust-Mus-174-157189
page(s): 160, 188 [details] Available for editors
[request]
page(s): 160, 188 [details] Available for editors
[request]
Taxonomy Huber (2015: 370) wrote "The application of genera [among Limopsidae] is therefore unsubstantiated and premature... for the...
Taxonomy Huber (2015: 370) wrote "The application of genera [among Limopsidae] is therefore unsubstantiated and premature... for the time being the subgeneric a approach is upheld, representing the best solution currently available", and this is followed herein, notwithstanding the contrary view of Janssen (2015) who treated all the currently accepted subgenera as full genera (and was followed in WoRMS at one time). Coan & Valentich-Scott (2012: 208) also concur in that " [Limopsis] has been split into several groups (...) but these characters are mutable and numerous intergrades occur."
[details]
[details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Aspalima Iredale, 1929. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=761899 on 2024-04-24
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Iredale, T. (1929). Mollusca from the continental shelf of eastern Australia. No 2. <em>Records of the Australian Museum.</em> 17(4): 157-189 [4 September 1929]., available online at http://australianmuseum.net.au/journal/Iredale-1929-Rec-Aust-Mus-174-157189
page(s): 160, 188 [details] Available for editors [request]
status source Janssen, R. (2015). A review of the Oligocene Limopsidae of the North Sea Basin (Mollusca: Bivalvia). <em>Geologica Saxonica.</em> 61 (1): 7-33., available online at https://www.senckenberg.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/02_geologica-saxonica61-1_2015_janssen.pdf [details] Available for editors [request]
page(s): 160, 188 [details] Available for editors
[request] status source Janssen, R. (2015). A review of the Oligocene Limopsidae of the North Sea Basin (Mollusca: Bivalvia). <em>Geologica Saxonica.</em> 61 (1): 7-33., available online at https://www.senckenberg.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/02_geologica-saxonica61-1_2015_janssen.pdf [details] Available for editors
[request] From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Huber (2015: 370) wrote "The application of genera [among Limopsidae] is therefore unsubstantiated and premature... for the time being the subgeneric a approach is upheld, representing the best solution currently available", and this is followed herein, notwithstanding the contrary view of Janssen (2015) who treated all the currently accepted subgenera as full genera (and was followed in WoRMS at one time). Coan & Valentich-Scott (2012: 208) also concur in that " [Limopsis] has been split into several groups (...) but these characters are mutable and numerous intergrades occur." [details]
