CaRMS Logo
Introduction | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Taxon match | Checklist | Literature | Stats | Photogallery | OBIS Vocab | Log in

CaRMS taxon details

Catriona Winckworth, 1941

138542  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:138542)

accepted
Genus
marine
Winckworth, R. (1941). The name Cratena. <em>Journal of Molluscan Studies.</em> 24(4): 146-149., available online at https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.mollus.a064404
page(s): 148 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available 
Taxonomy The distinctness of the genus Catriona was the subject of considerable debate. Burn (1973), Williams and Gosliner (1979)...  
Taxonomy The distinctness of the genus Catriona was the subject of considerable debate. Burn (1973), Williams and Gosliner (1979) and Gosliner and Griffiths (1981) all suggested that the bristled denticles and pre-radular teeth of Catriona are sufficient as unique characters of the genus. Miller (1977, 2004) and Brown (1980) had a different interpretation and considered the bristles an unsatisfactory diagnostic character, referring to Catriona as a junior synonym of Cuthona. Results from Cella et al. (2016) demonstrate that Catriona only becomes monophyletic with the inclusion of Tenellia adspersa, a result which renders it a junior synonym of Tenellia.

The species currently held in WoRMS as accepted under Catriona are nevertheless left unchanged until their status is re-evaluated.  [details]
MolluscaBase (2018). Catriona Winckworth, 1941. Accessed through: Kennedy, M.K., L. Van Guelpen, G. Pohle, L. Bajona (Eds.) (2018) Canadian Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/carms./aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=138542 on 2020-01-23
Kennedy, M.K., L. Van Guelpen, G. Pohle, L. Bajona (Eds.) (2020). Canadian Register of Marine Species. Catriona Winckworth, 1941. Accessed at: http://marinespecies.org/carms/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=138542 on 2020-01-23
Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
2014-05-06 10:59:29Z
changed
2015-01-27 21:41:47Z
changed
2016-12-17 08:52:08Z
changed
2016-12-21 11:51:09Z
changed
2017-09-28 13:49:48Z
changed

original description Winckworth, R. (1941). The name Cratena. <em>Journal of Molluscan Studies.</em> 24(4): 146-149., available online at https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.mollus.a064404
page(s): 148 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available 

taxonomy source Gosliner, T. M.; Griffiths, R. J. (1981). Description and revision of some South African aeolidacean Nudibranchia (Mollusca: Gastropoda. <em>Annals of the South African Museum.</em> 84: 105-150., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40660849
page(s): 134-135 [details]   

status source Korshunova, T.; Martynov, A.; Picton, B. (2017). Ontogeny as an important part of integrative taxonomy in tergipedid aeolidaceans (Gastropoda: Nudibranchia) with a description of a new genus and species from the Barents Sea. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 4324(1): 1., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4324.1.1 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available 
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy The distinctness of the genus Catriona was the subject of considerable debate. Burn (1973), Williams and Gosliner (1979) and Gosliner and Griffiths (1981) all suggested that the bristled denticles and pre-radular teeth of Catriona are sufficient as unique characters of the genus. Miller (1977, 2004) and Brown (1980) had a different interpretation and considered the bristles an unsatisfactory diagnostic character, referring to Catriona as a junior synonym of Cuthona. Results from Cella et al. (2016) demonstrate that Catriona only becomes monophyletic with the inclusion of Tenellia adspersa, a result which renders it a junior synonym of Tenellia.

The species currently held in WoRMS as accepted under Catriona are nevertheless left unchanged until their status is re-evaluated.  [details]
 



Website and databases developed and hosted by VLIZ · Page generated 2020-01-23 GMT · contact: