Deep-Sea taxon details
Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930
129192 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:129192)
accepted
Genus
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Gustafson, Gunnar. (1930). Anatomische studien über die polychäten-familien Amphinomidae und Euphrosynidae. <em>Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala.</em> 12: 305-471.
page(s): 308 [details] Available for editors
page(s): 308 [details] Available for editors
Taxonomic remark Tovar-Hernández et al (2024: 548) comment as follows: "Among Amphinomin genera, Pareurythoe is very similar to Cryptonome...
Taxonomic remark Tovar-Hernández et al (2024: 548) comment as follows: "Among Amphinomin genera, Pareurythoe is very similar to Cryptonome because both have chaetiger 1 dorsally incomplete, a small caruncle, and branchiae along most body chaetigers. However, there are two consistent differences between them. In Pareurythoe the median antenna is shorter than the caruncle, and first branchiae have a few filaments, whereas in Cryptonome the median antenna is as long as, or longer than caruncle, and first branchiae have many filaments. Another interesting difference is ecological, because the species of Pareurythoe have been found in sediments, whereas most Cryptonome species have been found in decaying wood" [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930. Accessed through: Glover, A.G.; Higgs, N.; Horton, T. (2024) World Register of Deep-Sea species (WoRDSS) at: https://www.marinespecies.org/deepsea/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129192 on 2024-04-19
Glover, A.G.; Higgs, N.; Horton, T. (2024). World Register of Deep-Sea species (WoRDSS). Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930. Accessed at: https://marinespecies.org/deepsea/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129192 on 2024-04-19
Date
action
by
original description
Gustafson, Gunnar. (1930). Anatomische studien über die polychäten-familien Amphinomidae und Euphrosynidae. <em>Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala.</em> 12: 305-471.
page(s): 308 [details] Available for editors
additional source Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. <em>Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series.</em> 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf [details]
additional source Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS) [details]
status source Borda, Elizabeth; Yáñez-Rivera, Beatriz; Ochoa, Gabriela M.; Kudenov, Jerry D.; Sanchez-Ortiz, Carlos; Schulze, Anja; Rouse, Greg W. (2015). Revamping Amphinomidae (Annelida: Amphinomida), with the inclusion of Notopygos. <em>Zoologica Scripta.</em> 44(3): 324-333., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12099
page(s): 330; note: included in Amphinominae [details]
status source Tovar-Hernández, María Ana.; González-Vallejo, Norma Emilia; Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2024). Cryptonome beatrizae n. sp., from drifting wood in Western Mexico, with remarks on Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930 (Annelida, Amphinomidae). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 5424(5): 535-553., available online at https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5424.5.3
page(s): 548; note: taxonomic remarks on distinction from Cryptonome [details] Available for editors
subsequent type designation Hartman, Olga. (1959). Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of the World. Parts 1 and 2. <em>Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Paper.</em> 23: 1-628.
page(s): 137 [details] Available for editors
page(s): 308 [details] Available for editors
additional source Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. <em>Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series.</em> 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf [details]
additional source Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS) [details]
status source Borda, Elizabeth; Yáñez-Rivera, Beatriz; Ochoa, Gabriela M.; Kudenov, Jerry D.; Sanchez-Ortiz, Carlos; Schulze, Anja; Rouse, Greg W. (2015). Revamping Amphinomidae (Annelida: Amphinomida), with the inclusion of Notopygos. <em>Zoologica Scripta.</em> 44(3): 324-333., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12099
page(s): 330; note: included in Amphinominae [details]
status source Tovar-Hernández, María Ana.; González-Vallejo, Norma Emilia; Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2024). Cryptonome beatrizae n. sp., from drifting wood in Western Mexico, with remarks on Pareurythoe Gustafson, 1930 (Annelida, Amphinomidae). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 5424(5): 535-553., available online at https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5424.5.3
page(s): 548; note: taxonomic remarks on distinction from Cryptonome [details] Available for editors
subsequent type designation Hartman, Olga. (1959). Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of the World. Parts 1 and 2. <em>Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Paper.</em> 23: 1-628.
page(s): 137 [details] Available for editors
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Tovar-Hernández et al (2024: 548) comment as follows: "Among Amphinomin genera, Pareurythoe is very similar to Cryptonome because both have chaetiger 1 dorsally incomplete, a small caruncle, and branchiae along most body chaetigers. However, there are two consistent differences between them. In Pareurythoe the median antenna is shorter than the caruncle, and first branchiae have a few filaments, whereas in Cryptonome the median antenna is as long as, or longer than caruncle, and first branchiae have many filaments. Another interesting difference is ecological, because the species of Pareurythoe have been found in sediments, whereas most Cryptonome species have been found in decaying wood" [details]
