About | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Specimens | Distribution | Checklist | Stats | Log in

Polychaeta name details

Serpula proboscidea (Bruguière, 1789)

331876  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:331876)

 unaccepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Bruguière J.G. (1789-1792). <i>Encyclopédie méthodique ou par ordre de matières. Histoire naturelle des vers</i>, volume 1. Paris: Pancoucke. Pp. 1-344 [June 1789]; 345-758 [13 Feb. 1792] [Dates after Evenhuis, 2003, <i>Zootaxa</i>, 166: 37; <i>Zootaxa</i>, 207]. , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/8638
page(s): 59 [details]   
Note Locality unknown  
Type locality Locality unknown [details]
Taxonomy Serpula proboscidea generally has been attributed to Gmelin (1791: 3745), and was regarded to be indeterminable by Hartman...  
Taxonomy Serpula proboscidea generally has been attributed to Gmelin (1791: 3745), and was regarded to be indeterminable by Hartman (1959: 597); however, according to Mörch (1863: 383) the basis of the description is in an old work of Fabricius (1610), and in Baster (1760 pl. 9 fig.3). The first available binomen is Amphitrite proboscidea Bruguière, 1789: 59. Baster's figure (under Serpula triquetra) most probably depicts Serpula vermicularis (contra Mörch, who assigns it to Hydroides norvegicus), as first mentioned by McIntosh (1923: 355), and which has been followed here. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2018). World Polychaeta database. Serpula proboscidea (Bruguière, 1789). Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=331876 on 2019-08-20
Date
action
by
2008-03-17 10:44:16Z
created
2008-03-26 11:36:43Z
changed
2010-01-08 13:14:50Z
changed

original description Bruguière J.G. (1789-1792). <i>Encyclopédie méthodique ou par ordre de matières. Histoire naturelle des vers</i>, volume 1. Paris: Pancoucke. Pp. 1-344 [June 1789]; 345-758 [13 Feb. 1792] [Dates after Evenhuis, 2003, <i>Zootaxa</i>, 166: 37; <i>Zootaxa</i>, 207]. , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/8638
page(s): 59 [details]   

basis of record Hartman, Olga. (1959). Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of the World. Parts 1 and 2. <em>Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Paper.</em> 23: 1-628. [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

additional source Mörch, O. A. L. (1863). Revisio critica Serpulidarum. Et Bidrag til Rørormenes Naturhistorie. <em>Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift.</em> København, Ser. 3, 1: 347-470, pl. 11 [also issued as a separate, 1–124, pl. 11]., available online at http://www.archive.org/details/naturhistoriskti01copeuoft
page(s): 383 [details]   

additional source Baster, J. (1759-1765). Opuscula subseciva. <em>Observationes miscellaneas de animalculis et plantis quibusdam marinis, eorumque ovariis et seminibus continentia. vol. 1:1-148, pls. 1-16; vol. 2:1-150, pls. 1-13.</em> , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/37988
page(s): pl.9 fig.3 [details]   

additional source Gmelin J.F. (1791). Vermes. In: Gmelin J.F. (Ed.) Caroli a Linnaei Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Ed. 13. Tome 1(6). G.E. Beer, Lipsiae [Leipzig]. pp. 3021-3910. , available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/83098#5
page(s): 3745 [details]   

source of synonymy McIntosh, W.C. 1923. A monograph of the British marine annelids. Polychaeta, Sabellidae to Serpulidae. With additions to the British marine Polychaeta during the publication of the monograph. Ray Society of London, 4(2): 251-538.
page(s): 355 [details]   
From editor or global species database
Editor's comment see Editor's comment under S. proboscidialis as well [details]

Original Combination Amphitrite proboscidea [details]

Taxonomy Serpula proboscidea generally has been attributed to Gmelin (1791: 3745), and was regarded to be indeterminable by Hartman (1959: 597); however, according to Mörch (1863: 383) the basis of the description is in an old work of Fabricius (1610), and in Baster (1760 pl. 9 fig.3). The first available binomen is Amphitrite proboscidea Bruguière, 1789: 59. Baster's figure (under Serpula triquetra) most probably depicts Serpula vermicularis (contra Mörch, who assigns it to Hydroides norvegicus), as first mentioned by McIntosh (1923: 355), and which has been followed here. [details]

From other sources
Type locality Locality unknown [details]