| About | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Specimens | | Distribution | | Checklist | | Stats | | Log in |
Polychaeta taxon detailsPolynoe foliosa Lamarck, 1818
337712 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:337712)
accepted
Species
marine,
recent only
Lamarck, J.B. (1818). [volume 5 of] Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, préséntant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s'y rapportent; precedes d'une Introduction offrant la determination des caracteres essentiels de l'Animal, sa distinction du vegetal et desautres corps naturels, enfin, l'Exposition des Principes fondamentaux de la Zoologie. <em>Paris, Deterville.</em> vol 5: 612 pp., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12886879 [details]
Status Status uncertain, but possibly belongs to Alentia. Fauvel (1923: 84) includes Polynoe foliosa Lamarck (1818) as a tentative...
Status Status uncertain, but possibly belongs to Alentia. Fauvel (1923: 84) includes Polynoe foliosa Lamarck (1818) as a tentative junior synonym of Halosydna gelatinosa (Sars, 1835) and earlier McIntosh (British Monograph, 1900: 384) had already included P. foliosa under Halsosydna gelatinosa, as had others he mentions, but this is obviously not possible given that Lamarck's name is senior. Instead Lamarck's name (adopted by him from the name in the unpublished Savigny MS) would replace the currently accepted Alentia gelatinosa if the synonymy was correct. However, in an application to the ICZN Muir (1979) repeated this synonymy without commenting on the fact that Lamarck's name (Muir incorrectly attributed it to Savigny) was senior to Sars name when he (Muir) stated that all Polynoe originally described had been removed to other genera. The type of Polynoe foliosa may be lost (not listed by the Solis-Weiss et al (2004) catalogue, so it may be indeterminable. [comment of G. Read, 3 February, 2024] [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Polynoe foliosa Lamarck, 1818. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=337712 on 2024-04-23
Date action by
original description
Lamarck, J.B. (1818). [volume 5 of] Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, préséntant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s'y rapportent; precedes d'une Introduction offrant la determination des caracteres essentiels de l'Animal, sa distinction du vegetal et desautres corps naturels, enfin, l'Exposition des Principes fondamentaux de la Zoologie. <em>Paris, Deterville.</em> vol 5: 612 pp., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12886879 [details]
source of synonymy Fauvel, P. (1923). Polychètes errantes. Faune de France. <em>Librairie de la Faculte des Sciences. Paris.</em> 5: 1-488., available online at http://www.faunedefrance.org/ page(s): 84; note: Fauvel (1923: 84) includes Polynoe foliosa Lamarck (1818) as a tentative synonym of Halosydna gelatinosa (Sars, 1835) but this is obviously not possible given that Lamarck's name is senior [details] From editor or global species database
Status Status uncertain, but possibly belongs to Alentia. Fauvel (1923: 84) includes Polynoe foliosa Lamarck (1818) as a tentative junior synonym of Halosydna gelatinosa (Sars, 1835) and earlier McIntosh (British Monograph, 1900: 384) had already included P. foliosa under Halsosydna gelatinosa, as had others he mentions, but this is obviously not possible given that Lamarck's name is senior. Instead Lamarck's name (adopted by him from the name in the unpublished Savigny MS) would replace the currently accepted Alentia gelatinosa if the synonymy was correct. However, in an application to the ICZN Muir (1979) repeated this synonymy without commenting on the fact that Lamarck's name (Muir incorrectly attributed it to Savigny) was senior to Sars name when he (Muir) stated that all Polynoe originally described had been removed to other genera. The type of Polynoe foliosa may be lost (not listed by the Solis-Weiss et al (2004) catalogue, so it may be indeterminable. [comment of G. Read, 3 February, 2024] [details]
|