 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
Porifera taxon detailsSarcotragus Schmidt, 1862131753 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:131753)
accepted
Genus
Sarcotragus spinosulus Schmidt, 1862 (type by subsequent designation)
Filifera (Sarcotragus) Schmidt, 1862 (genus transfer)
Hircinia (Sarcotragus) Schmidt, 1862 (status change)
Ircinia (Sarcotragus) Schmidt, 1862 (status change)
Stenospongia Burton, 1928 (junior synonym)
Species Sarcotragus aliger (Burton, 1928)
Species Sarcotragus australis (Lendenfeld, 1888) Species Sarcotragus chagwiensis Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus dentilus Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus fasciculatus (Pallas, 1766) Species Sarcotragus foetidus Schmidt, 1862 Species Sarcotragus gapaensis Sim & Lee, 2000 Species Sarcotragus geomunensis Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus levis Sim, Lee & Kim, 2017 Species Sarcotragus mamillus Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus maraensis Sim & Lee, 2000 Species Sarcotragus mureungensis Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus myrobalanus (Lamarck, 1814) Species Sarcotragus pipetta (Schmidt, 1868) Species Sarcotragus purpureus Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus ruetzleri Sim, Lee & Kim, 2017 Species Sarcotragus scalaris Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus schmidti Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus seogwiensis Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus spinosulus Schmidt, 1862 Species Sarcotragus sucinum Sim, Lee & Kim, 2016 Species Sarcotragus tuberculatus (Poléjaeff, 1884) Species Sarcotragus coreanus (Sim & Lee, 2002) accepted as Bergquistia coreana Sim & Lee, 2002 (reverted genus transfer) Species Sarcotragus muscarum Schmidt, 1864 accepted as Sarcotragus foetidus Schmidt, 1862 (junior synonym) Species Sarcotragus spinosula Schmidt, 1862 accepted as Sarcotragus spinosulus Schmidt, 1862 (misapplied species gender)
marine,
recent only
masculine
Schmidt, O. (1862). Die Spongien des adriatischen Meeres. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): i-viii, 1-88, pls 1-7. [details]
Van Soest, R.W.M.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Rützler, K.; de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Hajdu, E.; Pisera, A.B.; Manconi, R.; Schönberg, C.; Klautau, M.; Kelly, M.; Vacelet, J.; Dohrmann, M.; Díaz, M.-C.; Cárdenas, P.; Carballo, J.L.; Ríos, P.; Downey, R.; Morrow, C.C. (2021). World Porifera Database. Sarcotragus Schmidt, 1862. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=131753 on 2021-02-27
Date action by
original description
Schmidt, O. (1862). Die Spongien des adriatischen Meeres. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): i-viii, 1-88, pls 1-7. [details]
original description (of Stenospongia Burton, 1928) Burton, M. (1928). Report on some Deep-Sea Sponges from the Indian Museum collected by R.I.M.S. ‘Investigator'. Part II. Tetraxonida (concluded) and Euceratosa. <em>Records of the Indian Museum.</em> 30 (1): 109-138. page(s): 134 [details] original description (of Hircinia (Sarcotragus) Schmidt, 1862) Schmidt, O. (1862). Die Spongien des adriatischen Meeres. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): i-viii, 1-88, pls 1-7. [details] original description (of Filifera (Sarcotragus) Schmidt, 1862) Schmidt, O. (1862). Die Spongien des adriatischen Meeres. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): i-viii, 1-88, pls 1-7. page(s): 35 [details] basis of record Cook, S. de C.; Bergquist, P.R. (2002). Family Irciniidae Gray, 1867. Pp. 1022-1027. <i>In</i>: Hooper, J.N.A. & Van Soest, R.W.M. (ed.) Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers: New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London. [details]  additional source Kelly, M.; Edwards, A.R.; Wilkinson, M.R.; Alvarez, B.; Cook, S. de C.; Bergquist, P.R.; Buckeridge, St J.; Campbell, H.J.; Reiswig, H.M.; Valentine, C.; Vacelet, J. (2009). Phylum Porifera: sponges. <em>in: Gordon, D.P. (Ed.) (2009). New Zealand inventory of biodiversity: 1. Kingdom Animalia: Radiata, Lophotrochozoa, Deuterostomia.</em> pp. 23-46. [details] Available for editors  [request] additional source Sim, C. J.; Lee, K. J.; Kim, H. J. (2016b). Ten new species of genus <i>Sarcotragus</i> (Demospongiae: Dictyoceratida: Irciniidae) from Korea. <em>Journal of Species Research.</em> 5(3): 443-458., available online at https://doi.org/10.12651/jsr.2016.5.3.443 [details] Available for editors [request] additional source Van Soest, R.W.M. (2001). Porifera, <b><i>in</i></b>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification</i>. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 85-103. (look up in IMIS) [details] additional source Bergquist, P.R. (1980). A revision of the supraspecific classification of the orders Dictyoceratida, Dendroceratida and Verongida (class Demospongiae). <em>New Zealand Journal of Zoology.</em> 7 (4): 443-503. page(s): 466-468 [details] Available for editors [request] basis of record (of Stenospongia Burton, 1928) Cook, S. de C.; Bergquist, P.R. (2002). Family Irciniidae Gray, 1867. Pp. 1022-1027. <i>In</i>: Hooper, J.N.A. & Van Soest, R.W.M. (ed.) Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers: New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London. [details] basis of record (of Ircinia (Sarcotragus) Schmidt, 1862) Vacelet, J. (1959). Répartition générale des éponges et systématique des éponges cornées de la région de Marseille et de quelques stations méditerranéennes. <em>Recueil des Travaux de la Station marine d'Endoume.</em> 16 (26): 39-101, pls 1-3. page(s): 89 [details] Available for editors [request] additional source (of Hircinia (Sarcotragus) Schmidt, 1862) Lendenfeld, R. von. (1889). A Monograph of the Horny Sponges. (Trübner and Co.: London). iii-iv, 1-936, pls 1-50., available online at https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=chi.20735531;view=1up;seq=1 page(s): 569 [details]  Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Editor's comment With the recent (2016, 2017) addition of 12 species from Korea, all described from nearby localities, the species concept in the genus has become compromised. A critical revision, preferably with independent markers, e.g. DNA sequences, is necessary to come to grips with species variability in the genus . [details]
|