 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
WoRMS taxon detailsCeltodoryx chichiltik Cruz-Barraza, Carballo & Aguilar-Camacho, 2023
1672255 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1672255)
accepted
Species
marine,
recent only
Cruz-Barraza, J.A.; Carballo, J.L.; Aguilar-Camacho, J.M. (2023). Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetic position of new species and new records of Coelosphaeridae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific. <em>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> 199 (2): 511-532., available online at https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/advance-article/doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad036/7229485 [details] Available for editors
 [request]
Holotype ICML-UNAM LEB 144, geounit Cortezian
Holotype ICML-UNAM LEB 144, geounit Cortezian [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Celtodoryx chichiltik Cruz-Barraza, Carballo & Aguilar-Camacho, 2023. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1672255 on 2024-05-01
Date action by
original description
Cruz-Barraza, J.A.; Carballo, J.L.; Aguilar-Camacho, J.M. (2023). Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetic position of new species and new records of Coelosphaeridae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific. <em>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> 199 (2): 511-532., available online at https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/advance-article/doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad036/7229485 [details] Available for editors
[request]  Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
Holotype ICML-UNAM LEB 144, geounit Cortezian [details]
From editor or global species database
Editor's comment Celtodoryx chichiltik is a rather dubious Celtodoryx. The lack of spines on the megasclere endings and the very thin 'oxychaetes', which appear to differ from the straight and clearly oxea-like oxychaetes of C. ciocalyptoides are morphological differences. The molecular sequence results are difficult to explain, perhaps because the Poecilosclerid families are not sufficiently studied molecularly to make firm conclusions, but C. ciocalyptoides and C. chichiltik do not appear to be closely related. For the time being a different genus for C. chichiltik is not apparent, so the genus assignment is kept as the authors proposed.. [details]
|
