| Introduction | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Taxon match | | Checklist | | Literature | | Stats | | Photogallery | | OBIS Vocab | | Log in |
Copepoda name detailsDanielsseniidae Huys & Gee, in Huys, Gee, Moore & Hamond, 1996
 115148 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:115148)
unaccepted
Family
marine
Huys, R., J.M. Gee, C.G. Moore & R. Hamond. (1996). Marine and brackish water harpacticoid copepods. Part 1. Keys and notes for identification of the species. <em>In: Barnes, R.S.K. & J.H. Crothers (eds.). Synopses of the British Fauna, New Series, Published for the Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association.</em> 51(1):1-352. (look up in IMIS)
page(s): 236 [details] Available for editors  [request]
Taxonomic remark In their book of 2004 "An Introduction to Copepod Diversity", Boxshall and Halsey (2004) wrote the following: "Huys, Gee,...
Taxonomic remark In their book of 2004 "An Introduction to Copepod Diversity", Boxshall and Halsey (2004) wrote the following: "Huys, Gee, Moore & Hamond (1996) used the name Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee, 1996 for this taxon, rather than Paranannopidae because the Paranannopidae was based on an unavailable genus name. The cited work "Huys & Gee, 1996" has not been published, so the Danielsseniidae, is here attributed to Huys & Gee, in Huys, Gee, Moore & Hamond (1996)." Later, Huys (2009) wrote "The family name Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee in Huys et al., 1996 was accompanied by a differential diagnosis (Huys et al. 1996: 236; ICZN Art. 13.1.1) and was based on the available and still valid generic name Danielssenia Boeck, 1873 (ICZN Art. 13.2). Although the family name was not explicitly indicated as intentionally new or accompanied by a citation of the type genus (these provisions only apply to family-group names published after 1999; ICZN Arts. 16.1–2), the family-group name Danielsseniidae is valid. The family Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum] was relegated to a subfamily of the Pseudotachidiidae Lang, 1936c by Willen (1999, 2000); hence at this rank it should be cited as Danielsseniinae Huys & Gee in Huys et al. (1996)." [details] Taxonomic remark "Huys et al. (1996: 236), building on the non-availability of the generic name Paranannopus Lang, 1936a [nomen nudum],...
Taxonomic remark "Huys et al. (1996: 236), building on the non-availability of the generic name Paranannopus Lang, 1936a [nomen nudum], introduced the new family name Danielsseniidae to replace Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum], since family-group names taking their stem from an unavailable (and thus invalid) generic name, also become unavailable (ICZN Arts 11.7.1.1 and 63–64). In addition, it was believed at the time that continued use of the family name Paranannopidae would have been preferential for the sake of stability, but would also have the less favourable implication of basing the family on a type genus that (1) is very advanced and not really representative for the family, (2) is mostly known from females only, and (3) misleadingly alludes to a relationship with the genus Nannopus Brady, 1880a, currently placed in the family Huntemanniidae (= Nannopodidae, see below). Alternatively, the second option offered the possibility of designating another genus that is both well known and representative of the family. The family name Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee in Huys et al., 1996 was accompanied by a differential diagnosis (Huys et al. 1996: 236; ICZN Art. 13.1.1) and was based on the available and still valid generic name Danielssenia Boeck, 1873 (ICZN Art. 13.2). Although the family name was not explicitly indicated as intentionally new or accompanied by a citation of the type genus (these provisions only apply to family-group names published after 1999; ICZN Arts. 16.1–2), the family-group name Danielsseniidae is valid. The family Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum] was relegated to a subfamily of the Pseudotachidiidae Lang, 1936c by Willen (1999, 2000); hence at this rank it should be cited as Danielsseniinae Huys & Gee in Huys et al. (1996). Note also that the ending of the generic name Paranannopus is derived from the Greek stem pous (πους), meaning foot, and hence the correct spelling of the family name should have been Paranannopodidae." (after Huys, 2009). [details]
Walter, T.C.; Boxshall, G. (2024). World of Copepods Database. Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee, in Huys, Gee, Moore & Hamond, 1996. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/copepoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=115148 on 2024-07-17
Date action by
original description
Huys, R., J.M. Gee, C.G. Moore & R. Hamond. (1996). Marine and brackish water harpacticoid copepods. Part 1. Keys and notes for identification of the species. <em>In: Barnes, R.S.K. & J.H. Crothers (eds.). Synopses of the British Fauna, New Series, Published for the Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association.</em> 51(1):1-352. (look up in IMIS)
page(s): 236 [details] Available for editors [request] basis of record Huys, R. (2001). Copepoda - Harpacticoida. <em>In: Costello, M.J. et al. (eds.) European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50:268-280. (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors [request]  Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark In their book of 2004 "An Introduction to Copepod Diversity", Boxshall and Halsey (2004) wrote the following: "Huys, Gee, Moore & Hamond (1996) used the name Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee, 1996 for this taxon, rather than Paranannopidae because the Paranannopidae was based on an unavailable genus name. The cited work "Huys & Gee, 1996" has not been published, so the Danielsseniidae, is here attributed to Huys & Gee, in Huys, Gee, Moore & Hamond (1996)." Later, Huys (2009) wrote "The family name Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee in Huys et al., 1996 was accompanied by a differential diagnosis (Huys et al. 1996: 236; ICZN Art. 13.1.1) and was based on the available and still valid generic name Danielssenia Boeck, 1873 (ICZN Art. 13.2). Although the family name was not explicitly indicated as intentionally new or accompanied by a citation of the type genus (these provisions only apply to family-group names published after 1999; ICZN Arts. 16.1–2), the family-group name Danielsseniidae is valid. The family Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum] was relegated to a subfamily of the Pseudotachidiidae Lang, 1936c by Willen (1999, 2000); hence at this rank it should be cited as Danielsseniinae Huys & Gee in Huys et al. (1996)." [details]Taxonomic remark "Huys et al. (1996: 236), building on the non-availability of the generic name Paranannopus Lang, 1936a [nomen nudum], introduced the new family name Danielsseniidae to replace Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum], since family-group names taking their stem from an unavailable (and thus invalid) generic name, also become unavailable (ICZN Arts 11.7.1.1 and 63–64). In addition, it was believed at the time that continued use of the family name Paranannopidae would have been preferential for the sake of stability, but would also have the less favourable implication of basing the family on a type genus that (1) is very advanced and not really representative for the family, (2) is mostly known from females only, and (3) misleadingly alludes to a relationship with the genus Nannopus Brady, 1880a, currently placed in the family Huntemanniidae (= Nannopodidae, see below). Alternatively, the second option offered the possibility of designating another genus that is both well known and representative of the family. The family name Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee in Huys et al., 1996 was accompanied by a differential diagnosis (Huys et al. 1996: 236; ICZN Art. 13.1.1) and was based on the available and still valid generic name Danielssenia Boeck, 1873 (ICZN Art. 13.2). Although the family name was not explicitly indicated as intentionally new or accompanied by a citation of the type genus (these provisions only apply to family-group names published after 1999; ICZN Arts. 16.1–2), the family-group name Danielsseniidae is valid. The family Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum] was relegated to a subfamily of the Pseudotachidiidae Lang, 1936c by Willen (1999, 2000); hence at this rank it should be cited as Danielsseniinae Huys & Gee in Huys et al. (1996). Note also that the ending of the generic name Paranannopus is derived from the Greek stem pous (πους), meaning foot, and hence the correct spelling of the family name should have been Paranannopodidae." (after Huys, 2009). [details] |