Canadian Register of Marine Species

CaRMS source details

Name

Fitzhugh, K. (1990). A revision of the genus Fabricia Blainville, 1828 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae: Fabriciinae). Sarsia. 75: 1-16.

SourceID

49895

Authors

Fitzhugh, K.

Year

1990

Title

A revision of the genus Fabricia Blainville, 1828 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae: Fabriciinae)

Journal

Sarsia

Suffix

75: 1-16

Type

Publication

Note

Kristian Fauchald's Polychaeta DB

Abstract

The Fabriciinae genus Fabricia Blainville is revised. In the past, the type species designation for the genus has been confused; explicit designations have included Tubularia fabricia Mueller and Amphicora sabella Ehrenberg. The type species is actually T. stellaris Mueller, by monotypy. A neotype is designated and described for F. stellaris stellaris from the type locality.

Export

RIS (EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
BibTex (BibDesk, LaTeX)

Sessions

Date

action

2013-01-12 18:30:12Z

created

db_admin

[Back to search]

Fabricia Blainville, 1828 (status source)
Fabricia sabella (Ehrenberg, 1836) accepted as Fabricia stellaris (Müller, 1774) (status source)
Fabricia stellaris (Müller, 1774) (status source)

Neotype ZMUC ?? unstated, verbatimGeounit Eneboerodde, Odense ..., identified as Fabricia stellaris (Müller, 1774)

Taxonomy

for Fabricia gracilis Grube, 1855

Fitzhugh (1990) examined syntypes and determined they were probably an Amphiglena, but did not change the ... [details]

Type designation

for Othonia Johnston, 1835

Johnston (1835: 182) explicitly designated Tubularia fabricia Müller, 1776 as the type species of Othonia, an ... [details]

Type locality

for Fabricia stellaris (Müller, 1774)

Neotype (of Tubularia stellaris) type locality Odense Fjord, north coast of Fyn, Denmark, (Odense Fjord 55.4893 N, ... [details]

Type species

for Fabricia Blainville, 1828

Tubularia stellaris Müller, 1774. However, Fauchald, 1977 incorrectly has the type species as Amphicora sabella ... [details]

Type specimen

for Fabricia ventrilinguata Johansson, 1922

Nomen dubium as the only museum specimen is not as described in print and cannot be the type. Based on the ... [details]