CaRMS photogallery

CaRMS photogallery » Polychaetes

Echiuran worm (contracted)

Description Collected on DFO groundfish trawl survey in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Author Nozères, Claude JPG file - 165.20 kB - 1 600 x 1 067 pixels

Extra information
FileName: 107454.jpg
FileDateTime: 1436374009
FileSize: 165204
FileType: 2
MimeType: image/jpeg
SectionsFound: ANY_TAG, IFD0, THUMBNAIL, EXIF, GPS
COMPUTED.html: width="1600" height="1067"
COMPUTED.Height: 1067
COMPUTED.Width: 1600
COMPUTED.IsColor: 1
COMPUTED.ByteOrderMotorola: 0
COMPUTED.ApertureFNumber: f/5.9
COMPUTED.Thumbnail.FileType: 2
COMPUTED.Thumbnail.MimeType: image/jpeg
ImageDescription: burrowing anemone
Make: Panasonic
Model: DMC-TS3
Orientation: 1
XResolution: 150/1
YResolution: 150/1
ResolutionUnit: 2
Software: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh)
DateTime: 2015:07:08 12:23:51
Exif_IFD_Pointer: 248
GPS_IFD_Pointer: 718
ExposureTime: 1/60
FNumber: 59/10
ExposureProgram: 2
ISOSpeedRatings: 100
ExifVersion: 0230
DateTimeOriginal: 2012:08:02 15:18:37
DateTimeDigitized: 2012:08:02 15:18:37
ShutterSpeedValue: 5906891/1000000
ApertureValue: 512143/100000
ExposureBiasValue: 0/100
MaxApertureValue: 656/128
MeteringMode: 5
LightSource: 4
Flash: 25
FocalLength: 228/10
ColorSpace: 1
SensingMethod: 2
FileSource:
SceneType:
DigitalZoomRatio: 0/10
FocalLengthIn35mmFilm: 134
GPSVersion:
GPSLatitudeRef: N
GPSLatitude.0: 48/1
GPSLatitude.1: 3678/100
GPSLatitude.2: 0/1
GPSLongitudeRef: W
GPSLongitude.0: 60/1
GPSLongitude.1: 519102/10000
GPSLongitude.2: 0/1
GPSMapDatum: WGS-84
Location

added on 2015-07-081 639 viewsCaRMS taxaDigital photo, entire species Echiura Citation CaRMS Photogallery, 2015

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License

Click here to return to the thumbnails overview

Comment (1)

added on 2018-08-08 16:17:32 by Pilger, John F.

Unidentifiable from photograph only. Definitely an echiuran, but I cannot classify it completely because I cannot accurately count the longitudinal muscle bands and the prostomium (proboscis) is missing.
It is not Pseudobonellia because the bonellids do not have the longitudinal muscle bands that clearly are present in this specimen.