WoRMS taxon details
Acrocnida Gislén, 1926
236129 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:236129)
accepted
Genus
Amphiura (Acrocnida) · unaccepted (unsupported synonym)
- Species Acrocnida brachiata (Montagu, 1804)
- Species Acrocnida fuscoalba (Brock, 1888)
- Species Acrocnida semisquamata (Koehler, 1914)
- Species Acrocnida spatulispina Stöhr & Muths, 2010
- Species Acrocnida neapolitana (M. Sars, 1857) accepted as Acrocnida brachiata (Montagu, 1804) (synonymized by Madsen (1970))
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Gislén, T. 1926. On the generic types of the ophiurid genus Ophiocentrus Ljungman (Amphiocnida Verrill). Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhälles Handlingar. Fjärde Följden, 30(6), 1-16. (look up in IMIS)
page(s): 14 [details] Available for editors
[request]
page(s): 14 [details] Available for editors
[request]
Taxonomy The taxonomic status of the genus Acrocnida has been questioned and it has been suggested as a possible subgenus of...
Taxonomy The taxonomic status of the genus Acrocnida has been questioned and it has been suggested as a possible subgenus of Amphiura. However, pending a formal revision, the name is valid. [details]
Stöhr, S.; O’Hara, T.; Thuy, B. (Eds) (2024). World Ophiuroidea Database. Acrocnida Gislén, 1926. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=236129 on 2024-11-14
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Gislén, T. 1926. On the generic types of the ophiurid genus Ophiocentrus Ljungman (Amphiocnida Verrill). Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhälles Handlingar. Fjärde Följden, 30(6), 1-16. (look up in IMIS)
page(s): 14 [details] Available for editors [request]
page(s): 14 [details] Available for editors
[request]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy The taxonomic status of the genus Acrocnida has been questioned and it has been suggested as a possible subgenus of Amphiura. However, pending a formal revision, the name is valid. [details]
