AfReMaS banner
About | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Checklist | Stats | Log in

WoRMS name details

Latirus mosselensis Tomlin, 1932

447150  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:447150)

 unaccepted (original combination)
Species
marine
Tomlin, J. R. le B. (1932). Reports on the marine Mollusca in the collection of the South African Museum. 6-8. Families Fasciolariidae, Fissurellidae, Buccinidae. <em>Annals of the South African Museum.</em> 30: 157-169., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40855798
page(s): 158, fig. 2. [details] 
Note Mossel Bay type locality considered erroneous...  
Type locality Mossel Bay type locality considered erroneous by Marais & Kilburn (2010) [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Latirus mosselensis Tomlin, 1932. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=447150 on 2024-12-21
Date
action
by
2010-01-12 13:33:51Z
created
2010-07-09 09:18:48Z
changed
2011-07-22 17:20:07Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Tomlin, J. R. le B. (1932). Reports on the marine Mollusca in the collection of the South African Museum. 6-8. Families Fasciolariidae, Fissurellidae, Buccinidae. <em>Annals of the South African Museum.</em> 30: 157-169., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40855798
page(s): 158, fig. 2. [details] 

additional source Kilburn R.N. (1973). Notes on some benthic Mollusca from Natal and Moçambique with descriptions of new species and subspecies of <i>Calliostoma, Solariella, Latiaxis, Babylonia, Fusinus, Bathytoma</i> and <i>Conus</i>. <em>Annals of the Natal Museum.</em> 21(3): 557-578.
page(s): 569, holotype illustrated, fig. 12a. [details] Available for editors  PDF available [request]
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Type locality Mossel Bay type locality considered erroneous by Marais & Kilburn (2010) [details]