WoRMS name details
Nomenclatureoriginal description
(of Euthalenessa insignis Ehlers, 1908) Ehlers, Ernst. (1908). Die bodensässigen Anneliden aus den Sammlungen der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. 1-168. IN: Chun, Carl (Ed.). <em>Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer ''Valdivia'' 1898-1899.</em> 16(1): 1-168, plates I-XXIII., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/18687 page(s): 52-55, plate I figs. 10-11, plate II figs. 1-9 [details]
basis of record
Augener, Hermann. (1918). Polychaeta. <em>Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas.</em> 2(2): 67-625, plates II-VII., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7172280 page(s): 108 [details]
basis of record
Hartman, Olga. (1959). Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of the World. Parts 1 and 2. <em>Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Paper.</em> 23: 1-628. page(s): 115; note: incorrectly as "Euthalenessa insignis Augener, 1918" [details] Available for editors [request]
Taxonomystatus source
Pettibone, Marian H. (1970). Revision of the genus Euthalenessa Darboux (Polychaeta: Sigalionidae). <em>Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology.</em> 52: 1-30., available online at http://si-pddr.si.edu/dspace/handle/10088/6313 note: appears to have examined this material and included it in Euthalenessa oculata [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy No nomenclatural status. Retained as explanatory record only. This usage originated in Hartman catalogue (1959:115), where there is a separate incorrect entry for Euthalenessa insignis authored by Augener, 1918 as a species, with a comment that it differed from E. insignis Ehlers, 1908 (which Hartman referred to E. oculata). This checklist entry has created the unfortunate impression that Augener described a new taxon. He did not. Augener had recorded Ehlers' S. African species from W. Africa, giving a long description, but using Ehler's name without a qualification (such as a cf). Pettibone examined W. African ZMH specimens in her revision, and it seems these were Augener's material as the collector, Hupfer, is the same. Pettibone simply included the specimens as part of E. oculata, of which E. insignis was a junior synonym [details]
Type locality Not distinct. Not named. There is no type locality [details]
| |