WoRMS taxon details

Schulzeviella Tabachnick, 1990

171588  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:171588)

accepted
Genus
Poliopogon gigas Schulze, 1886 accepted as Schulzeviella gigas (Schulze, 1886) (type by original designation)

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
feminine
Tabachnick, K.R. (1990). Hexactinellid sponges from the Nasca and Sala-y-Gomez. <em>Trudi of the Institute of Oceanology Academy of Sciences of USSR.</em> 124: 161-173.
page(s): 161 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Note Tabachnick (1990: 151) mentioned Poliopogon...  
Type species Tabachnick (1990: 151) mentioned Poliopogon gigas Schulze, 1887 when he erected the genus, so this is eligible as type species. It was confirmed later (Tabachnick, 2002: 1274), misspelling the type species name as Poliopogon giagas Schulze, 1886, stating this was the type species by monotypy. However, the 1990 article contains the description of a new subspecies ssp. spinosum Tabachnick, 1990 (genus name misspelled as Shulzeviella), inferring there had to be also a nominotypical subspecies P.gigas ssp. gigas. The monotypy designation technically is then a subsequent designation. The subspecies spinosum was later (2002) reassigned to the nominotypical subspecies and the species is thus monotypical and the correct type species is indeed P. gigas. Despite the misspellings and rather irregular type species designation, we deem this correct. [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Schulzeviella Tabachnick, 1990. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=171588 on 2024-04-25
Date
action
by
2005-07-10 18:05:41Z
created
db_admin
2008-10-16 18:15:19Z
changed
2019-11-02 08:42:01Z
changed
2020-12-17 10:11:20Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Tabachnick, K.R. (1990). Hexactinellid sponges from the Nasca and Sala-y-Gomez. <em>Trudi of the Institute of Oceanology Academy of Sciences of USSR.</em> 124: 161-173.
page(s): 161 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

basis of record Tabachnick, K.R.; Menshenina, L.L. (2002). Family Pheronematidae Gray, 1870. pp. 1267-1280. <i>In</i>: Hooper, J. N. A. & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2002) Systema Porifera - A guide to the classification of sponges. (2 volumes). (Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers: New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow), 1708 + xvliii. ISBN 0-306-47260-0 (printed version). [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

basis of record Tabachnick, K.R.; Menshenina, L.L. (2002 [2004]). Family Pheronematidae Gray, 1870. pp. 1267-1280. <i>In</i>: Hooper, J. N. A. & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2002 [2004]) Systema Porifera - A guide to the classification of sponges. (2 volumes). (Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers: New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow), 1708 + xvliii. ISBN 978-1-4615-0747-5 (eBook electronic version). [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Type species Tabachnick (1990: 151) mentioned Poliopogon gigas Schulze, 1887 when he erected the genus, so this is eligible as type species. It was confirmed later (Tabachnick, 2002: 1274), misspelling the type species name as Poliopogon giagas Schulze, 1886, stating this was the type species by monotypy. However, the 1990 article contains the description of a new subspecies ssp. spinosum Tabachnick, 1990 (genus name misspelled as Shulzeviella), inferring there had to be also a nominotypical subspecies P.gigas ssp. gigas. The monotypy designation technically is then a subsequent designation. The subspecies spinosum was later (2002) reassigned to the nominotypical subspecies and the species is thus monotypical and the correct type species is indeed P. gigas. Despite the misspellings and rather irregular type species designation, we deem this correct. [details]