WoRMS name details
Enponatus dipona [misspelling]
381235 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:381235)
unaccepted (misspelling of 'dipoma' plus genus misspelling)
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
(of Eupomatus dipoma Schmarda, 1861) Schmarda, L. K. (1861). Neue Wirbellose Thiere: Beobachted und Gesammelt auf einer Reise um die Erdr 1853 bis 1857. <em>In Turbellarien, Rotatorien und Anneliden. Leipzig, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.</em> Erster Band, Zweite Hälfte., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ia/neuewirbelloseth21861schm [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Enponatus dipona [misspelling]. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=381235 on 2024-04-19
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
(of Eupomatus dipoma Schmarda, 1861) Schmarda, L. K. (1861). Neue Wirbellose Thiere: Beobachted und Gesammelt auf einer Reise um die Erdr 1853 bis 1857. <em>In Turbellarien, Rotatorien und Anneliden. Leipzig, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.</em> Erster Band, Zweite Hälfte., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ia/neuewirbelloseth21861schm [details]
basis of record Wade, Bruce. (1921). The fossil annelid genus Hamulus Morton, an operculate Serpula. <em>Proceedings of the United States National Museum.</em> 59(2359): 41-46., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7562823
page(s): 42; note: in text mention of Enponatus dipona, a triple misspelling of Eupomatus dipoma Schmarda [details]
basis of record Wade, Bruce. (1921). The fossil annelid genus Hamulus Morton, an operculate Serpula. <em>Proceedings of the United States National Museum.</em> 59(2359): 41-46., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7562823
page(s): 42; note: in text mention of Enponatus dipona, a triple misspelling of Eupomatus dipoma Schmarda [details]
From editor or global species database
Spelling A remarkable in-text double misspelling of the actual genus (two errors) and species. Correct spelling is Eupomatus dipoma, as authored by Schmarda, 1861 [details]