WoRMS name details

Enoplopatiria siderea Verrill, 1914

382118  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:382118)

 unaccepted (In need of reassessment.)
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Verrill, A.E. (1914). Monograph of the shallow-water starfishes of the North Pacific coast from the Arctic Ocean to California. Harriman Alaska series: US National Museum 14: 1-408 pp., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/20755223
page(s): 365; note: Although the author/date is listed in several places as Verrill (1913: 480) this species is NOT present in the asterinid account. (It may have been intended to have been there). Technically this makes...  
Although the author/date is listed in several places as Verrill (1913: 480) this species is NOT present in the asterinid account. (It may have been intended to have been there). Technically this makes the first published account, its mention in Verrill (1914) contrary to most other accounts.
 [details]   
Mah, C.L. (2024). World Asteroidea Database. Enoplopatiria siderea Verrill, 1914. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=382118 on 2024-04-18
Date
action
by
2009-02-01 01:36:32Z
created
2010-10-27 22:09:00Z
changed
2017-10-14 10:52:13Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Verrill, A.E. (1914). Monograph of the shallow-water starfishes of the North Pacific coast from the Arctic Ocean to California. Harriman Alaska series: US National Museum 14: 1-408 pp., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/20755223
page(s): 365; note: Although the author/date is listed in several places as Verrill (1913: 480) this species is NOT present in the asterinid account. (It may have been intended to have been there). Technically this makes...  
Although the author/date is listed in several places as Verrill (1913: 480) this species is NOT present in the asterinid account. (It may have been intended to have been there). Technically this makes the first published account, its mention in Verrill (1914) contrary to most other accounts.
 [details]