WoRMS name details

Aephnidiogenes ptochus Nicoll, 1915

727240  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:727240)

uncertain > taxon inquirendum
Species
Lepidapedon ptochus (Nicoll, 1915) Skrjabin & Koval, 1960 · unaccepted (Superseded combination)
marine
Nicoll, W. (1915). The trematode parasites of north Queensland. III. Parasites of fishes. <em>Parasitology.</em> 8: 22-41.
note: brief description, no illustration, = Distoma levenseni Linton, 1907 in part [details]   
Taxonomy 'As stated by (Thomas, 1960), the species Aephnidiogenes ptochus does not belong in this genus and should be considered a...  
Taxonomy 'As stated by (Thomas, 1960), the species Aephnidiogenes ptochus does not belong in this genus and should be considered a species inquirenda. It is based partly on Linton’s (1907) description of Distomum levenseni, and in particular, the worm from Epinephelus striatus illustrated as his figure 80. It has short lateral vitelline fields at about the level of the ovary, and generally bears no relationship with Aephnidiogenes.' [details]
WoRMS (2024). Aephnidiogenes ptochus Nicoll, 1915. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=727240 on 2024-04-18
Date
action
by
2013-04-16 09:58:56Z
created
2013-11-18 10:18:01Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Nicoll, W. (1915). The trematode parasites of north Queensland. III. Parasites of fishes. <em>Parasitology.</em> 8: 22-41.
note: brief description, no illustration, = Distoma levenseni Linton, 1907 in part [details]   
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Taxonomy 'As stated by (Thomas, 1960), the species Aephnidiogenes ptochus does not belong in this genus and should be considered a species inquirenda. It is based partly on Linton’s (1907) description of Distomum levenseni, and in particular, the worm from Epinephelus striatus illustrated as his figure 80. It has short lateral vitelline fields at about the level of the ovary, and generally bears no relationship with Aephnidiogenes.' [details]