CaRMS taxon details
original description
Payraudeau, B. C. (1826). Catalogue descriptif et méthodique des annelides et des mollusques de l'Ile de Corse; avec huit planches représentant quatre-vingt-huit espèces, dont soixante-huit nouvelles. Imprimerie de J. Tastu, Paris, vii + 218 pp., pls. 1-8., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/12944 page(s): 81, pl. 3 fig. 3 [details]
context source (MSBIAS)
MEDIN. (2011). UK checklist of marine species derived from the applications Marine Recorder and UNICORN. version 1.0. [details]
basis of record
Huber, M. (2010). <i>Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world's marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research</i>. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. 901 pp., 1 CD-ROM. (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional source
Hu L. [Lisha], Wang H. [Haiyan], Zhang Z. [Zhen], Li, C. [Cui] & Guo X. [Ximing]. (2019). Classification of small flat oysters of <i>Ostrea stentina</i> species complex and a new species <i>Ostrea neostentina</i> sp. nov. (Bivalvia: Ostreidae). <em>Journal of Shellfish Research.</em> 38(2): 295-308., available online at https://doi.org/10.2983/035.038.0210 [details]
additional source
Shilts M.H., Pascual M.S. & Ó Foighil D., 2007. Systematic, taxonomic and biogeographic relationships of Argentine flat oysters. <i>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution</i> 44: 467-473 [details]
identification resource
Cosel, R. von; Gofas, S. (2019). <i>Marine bivalves of tropical West Africa: from Rio de Oro to southern Angola</i>. Publications Scientifiques du Muséum, Paris, IRD Éditions, Marseille (Faune et Flore tropicales, volume 48): 1-1104. page(s): 310-311 [details]
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature The earlier name Ostrea capsa Fischer von Waldheim, 1807 has been put forward by Huber (2010: 607-608) as the valid name to be used for this species. However the name Ostrea stentina is in usage and the provisions of ICZN art. 23.9 may apply. Awaiting either confirmation that the requirements of this article are met, and formal declaration of respectively “nomen oblitum” and “nomen protectum”, or bringing the case to the ICZN, the name in prevailing usage is here maintained as “accepted”. [details]
From editor or global species database
From other sources
| |