Copepoda source details
Bolduc, P., Z.E. Taranu, B. Pinel-Alloul & A. Bertolo. (2026). Taxonomy and Functional Traits Modulate the Environmental Niche Dimensions of Crustacean Zooplankton Communities in Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Beds. Freshwater Biology. 71:1-17. e70193.
560440
10.1111/fwb.70193 [view]
Bolduc, P., Z.E. Taranu, B. Pinel-Alloul & A. Bertolo
2026
Taxonomy and Functional Traits Modulate the Environmental Niche Dimensions of Crustacean Zooplankton Communities in Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Beds.
Freshwater Biology
71:1-17. e70193
Publication
Available for editors
[request]
1. Community ecologists now recognise the importance of simultaneously integrating spatial and environmental processes, together with functional traits and phylogeny to provide a more complete understanding of community responses to environmental conditions. Although a growing number of studies integrate these elements, few have looked at the communityenvironmental relationship in highly dynamic ecosystems such as fluvial lakes.
2. In this study, we used information on zooplankton functional traits and taxonomy-based phylogeny within a joint species distribution modelling (JSDMs) framework to explore how crustacean zooplankton communities are organised across a heterogeneous submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) bed of a large, shallow fluvial lake (Lake Saint-Pierre, Québec, Canada). We also evaluated the consistency of our results over time by analysing samples of zooplankton collected over the span of three summers (2012–2014) at approximately 30 sites along the south shore of the lake. More precisely, we investigated how eco logical processes shaped species co-responses to SAV habitats and water conditions among years with different hydrological regimes.
3. Of the 72 zooplankton taxa detected across sites and years, the dominant cladocerans were largely composed of macrophyteassociated taxa that is, Bosminidae, Chydoridae and Sididae. Water depth and flow, chemical and trophic conditions, SAV and the abundance of filamentous algae were all found to be important drivers of zooplankton community variation. Albeit their relative importance changed over the years, spatial changes in trophic status (nutrients, chlorophyll a), conductivity (calcium), dystrophy (DOC, water colour), water depth and water flow had a major influence on zooplankton niche dimensionality. Nevertheless, SAV was particularly important in explaining the environmental niche of larger zooplankton (Chydoridae and Sididae). The spatial variation in species niches was best reflected by functional traits linked to feeding and habitat types, and body size; that is, even though the taxonomic composition and species-level responses changed over the 3 years of sampling, responses at the species traitlevel remained consistent, suggesting a repetition in functional patterns across time. The application of JSDMs helped highlight the extent to which traits can explain the variation among species in their responses to both water condition and SAV habitat.
Date
action
by
Acanthocyclops brevispinosus (Herrick, 1884) (additional source)
Acanthocyclops robustus (Sars G.O., 1863) represented as Acanthocyclops robustus robustus (Sars G.O., 1863) (additional source)
Acanthocyclops venustoides (Coker, 1934) represented as Acanthocyclops venustoides venustoides (Coker, 1934) (additional source)
Cyclops scutifer Sars G.O., 1863 represented as Cyclops scutifer scutifer Sars G.O., 1863 (additional source)
Diacyclops nanus (Sars G.O., 1863) represented as Diacyclops nanus nanus (Sars G.O., 1863) (additional source)
Epischura lacustris Forbes S.A., 1882 (additional source)
Eucyclops agilis (Koch, 1838) accepted as Eucyclops agilis agilis (Koch, 1838) (additional source)
Eucyclops elegans (Herrick, 1884) represented as Eucyclops (Eucyclops) elegans (Herrick, 1884) represented as Eucyclops (Eucyclops) elegans elegans (Herrick, 1884) (additional source)
Eucyclops prionophorus Kiefer, 1931 (additional source)
Eurytemora affinis (Poppe, 1880) represented as Eurytemora affinis affinis (Poppe, 1880) (additional source)
Macrocyclops albidus (Jurine, 1820) represented as Macrocyclops albidus albidus (Jurine, 1820) (additional source)
Macrocyclops ater (Herrick, 1882) accepted as Homocyclops ater (Herrick, 1882) (additional source)
Macrocyclops fuscus (Jurine, 1820) (additional source)
Mesochra alaskana Wilson M.S., 1958 (additional source)
Mesocyclops americanus Dussart, 1985 represented as Mesocyclops (Mesocyclops) americanus Dussart, 1985 (additional source)
Mesocyclops edax (Forbes S.A., 1891) represented as Mesocyclops (Neomesocyclops) edax (Forbes, 1891) (additional source)
Microcyclops rubellus (Lilljeborg, 1901) represented as Microcyclops (Microcyclops) rubellus (Lilljeborg, 1901) (additional source)
Microcyclops varicans (Sars G.O., 1863) represented as Microcyclops varicans varicans (Sars G.O., 1863) (additional source)
Nitokra hibernica (Brady, 1880) represented as Nitocra hibernica (Brady, 1880) represented as Nitocra hibernica hibernica (Brady, 1880) (additional source)
Onychocamptus mohammed (Blanchard & Richard, 1891) (additional source)
Orthocyclops modestus (Herrick, 1883) (additional source)
Paracyclops poppei (Rehberg, 1880) (additional source)
Schizopera borutzkyi Monchenko, 1967 (additional source)
Tropocyclops prasinus (Fischer, 1860) represented as Tropocyclops prasinus prasinus (Fischer, 1860) (additional source)
Acanthocyclops robustus (Sars G.O., 1863) represented as Acanthocyclops robustus robustus (Sars G.O., 1863) (additional source)
Acanthocyclops venustoides (Coker, 1934) represented as Acanthocyclops venustoides venustoides (Coker, 1934) (additional source)
Cyclops scutifer Sars G.O., 1863 represented as Cyclops scutifer scutifer Sars G.O., 1863 (additional source)
Diacyclops nanus (Sars G.O., 1863) represented as Diacyclops nanus nanus (Sars G.O., 1863) (additional source)
Epischura lacustris Forbes S.A., 1882 (additional source)
Eucyclops agilis (Koch, 1838) accepted as Eucyclops agilis agilis (Koch, 1838) (additional source)
Eucyclops elegans (Herrick, 1884) represented as Eucyclops (Eucyclops) elegans (Herrick, 1884) represented as Eucyclops (Eucyclops) elegans elegans (Herrick, 1884) (additional source)
Eucyclops prionophorus Kiefer, 1931 (additional source)
Eurytemora affinis (Poppe, 1880) represented as Eurytemora affinis affinis (Poppe, 1880) (additional source)
Macrocyclops albidus (Jurine, 1820) represented as Macrocyclops albidus albidus (Jurine, 1820) (additional source)
Macrocyclops ater (Herrick, 1882) accepted as Homocyclops ater (Herrick, 1882) (additional source)
Macrocyclops fuscus (Jurine, 1820) (additional source)
Mesochra alaskana Wilson M.S., 1958 (additional source)
Mesocyclops americanus Dussart, 1985 represented as Mesocyclops (Mesocyclops) americanus Dussart, 1985 (additional source)
Mesocyclops edax (Forbes S.A., 1891) represented as Mesocyclops (Neomesocyclops) edax (Forbes, 1891) (additional source)
Microcyclops rubellus (Lilljeborg, 1901) represented as Microcyclops (Microcyclops) rubellus (Lilljeborg, 1901) (additional source)
Microcyclops varicans (Sars G.O., 1863) represented as Microcyclops varicans varicans (Sars G.O., 1863) (additional source)
Nitokra hibernica (Brady, 1880) represented as Nitocra hibernica (Brady, 1880) represented as Nitocra hibernica hibernica (Brady, 1880) (additional source)
Onychocamptus mohammed (Blanchard & Richard, 1891) (additional source)
Orthocyclops modestus (Herrick, 1883) (additional source)
Paracyclops poppei (Rehberg, 1880) (additional source)
Schizopera borutzkyi Monchenko, 1967 (additional source)
Tropocyclops prasinus (Fischer, 1860) represented as Tropocyclops prasinus prasinus (Fischer, 1860) (additional source)
