Golikov & Starobogatov (1975) declared this family as new though the true author of this taxon is Jousseaume ... [details]
Golikov & Starobogatov (1975) declared this family as new though the true author of this taxon is Jousseaume ... [details]
Mesocochliopa was originally classified as a genus of Amnicolidae by Yen & Reeside (1946) and was also listed as a ... [details]
Cepolidae Ihering, 1909 is a junior homonym of Cepolidae Rafinesque, 1815 [Pisces]. The case will be referred to ... [details]
Two family-group names are older than Babyloniidae. Swainson based his concept of Eburninae on species of ... [details]
Cerastua Strand, 1928 was proposed as a replacement name for Cerastus E. von Martens, 1860 (non Dejean, 1821, ... [details]
Cerastuidae was based on Cerastua Strand, 1928, an unnecessary replacement name for Ceratsus E. von Martens, 1860. [details]
When he established Cochlicopidae, Pilsbry (1900) did not justify his action. Later, he (Pilsbry, 1908 [in ... [details]
Röding listed "Bulla ficus" [Murex ficus Linnaeus, 1758] in the synonymy of Ficus communis Röding, 1798, and ... [details]
Takes precedence from Rotellinae Swainson, 1840 [details]
The spelling "Anastomopsidae" as used in the literature is based on Anastomopsis, an incorrect subsequent spelling ... [details]
Name only, no diagnosis. Not available under Art. 13.2.1, unless discovery of an author who used the name before 2000 [details]
The genus name Orthopoma was established without any included species, and it appears that none was ever ... [details]
Originally proposed as subfamily of Conidae although ranked as "Famille Siphopsinae" [sic] in Pacaud & Le Renard, ... [details]
Originally proposed as a subfamily of Conidae, Siphopsinae Le Renard, 1995 is invalid because the type genus type ... [details]
The name Triforis, as used by Deshayes (1834) is an incorrect subsequent spelling of Triphora Blainville, 1828 and ... [details]
For uncertainties concerning the type species, see the discussion by Bouchet et al. (2017). [details]