Foraminifera source details
Amphitomariidae Bandel, 1994 † (basis of record)
Architectonicoidea J. E. Gray, 1850 (basis of record)
Heterobranchia (additional source)
Heterobranchia (basis of record)
Stromboidea Rafinesque, 1815 (basis of record)
Xenophoridae Troschel, 1852 (1840) (basis of record)
Xenophoroidea Troschel, 1852 (1840) accepted as Stromboidea Rafinesque, 1815 (basis of record)
Golikov & Starobogatov (1975) declared this family as new though the true author of this taxon is Jousseaume ... [details]
Golikov & Starobogatov (1975) declared this family as new though the true author of this taxon is Jousseaume ... [details]
Mesocochliopa was originally classified as a genus of Amnicolidae by Yen & Reeside (1946) and was also listed as a ... [details]
Cepolidae Ihering, 1909 is a junior homonym of Cepolidae Rafinesque, 1815 [Pisces]. The case will be referred to ... [details]
Two family-group names are older than Babyloniidae. Swainson based his concept of Eburninae on species of ... [details]
Cerastua Strand, 1928 was proposed as a replacement name for Cerastus E. von Martens, 1860 (non Dejean, 1821, ... [details]
Cerastuidae was based on Cerastua Strand, 1928, an unnecessary replacement name for Ceratsus E. von Martens, 1860. [details]
When he established Cochlicopidae, Pilsbry (1900) did not justify his action. Later, he (Pilsbry, 1908 [in ... [details]
Röding listed "Bulla ficus" [Murex ficus Linnaeus, 1758] in the synonymy of Ficus communis Röding, 1798, and ... [details]
Takes precedence from Rotellinae Swainson, 1840 [details]
The spelling "Anastomopsidae" as used in the literature is based on Anastomopsis, an incorrect subsequent spelling ... [details]
Name only, no diagnosis. Not available under Art. 13.2.1, unless discovery of an author who used the name before 2000 [details]
The genus name Orthopoma was established without any included species, and it appears that none was ever ... [details]
Originally proposed as subfamily of Conidae although ranked as "Famille Siphopsinae" [sic] in Pacaud & Le Renard, ... [details]
Originally proposed as a subfamily of Conidae, Siphopsinae Le Renard, 1995 is invalid because the type genus type ... [details]
The name Triforis, as used by Deshayes (1834) is an incorrect subsequent spelling of Triphora Blainville, 1828 and ... [details]