Hydrozoa taxon details
Koellikerina jaschnowi (Naumov, 1956)
1041965 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1041965)
accepted
Species
Chiarella jaschnowi (Naumov, 1956) · unaccepted
Rathkea jaschnowi Naumov, 1956 · unaccepted (basionym)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
(of Rathkea jaschnowi Naumov, 1956) Naumov, D.V., 1956. Medusae in the far-eastern waters of the Soviet Union. Trud. Problem Temat. Sovesh. 6: 34-41. [details]
Taxonomic remark This species cannot remain in the genus Chiarella as advocated by Kamp (1961). Bipartite tetntacle bulbs are diagnostic for...
Taxonomic remark This species cannot remain in the genus Chiarella as advocated by Kamp (1961). Bipartite tetntacle bulbs are diagnostic for the genus Chiarella and they are not present in this species according to Naumov (1969) [details]
Schuchert, P.; Choong, H.; Galea, H.; Hoeksema, B.; Lindsay, D.; Manko, M.; Pica, D. (2025). World Hydrozoa Database. Koellikerina jaschnowi (Naumov, 1956). Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/Hydrozoa/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1041965 on 2026-08-19
Date
action
by
original description
(of Rathkea jaschnowi Naumov, 1956) Naumov, D.V., 1956. Medusae in the far-eastern waters of the Soviet Union. Trud. Problem Temat. Sovesh. 6: 34-41. [details]
status source Lindsay D.J., Miyake H. (2009). A checklist of midwater cnidarians and ctenophores from Japanese waters ‒species sampled during submersible surveys from 1993-2008 with notes on their taxonomy. <em>Kaiyo Monthly.</em> 41(8): 417–438.
page(s): 342; note: (= distinct from C. centripetalis) [details] Available for editors
status source Lindsay D.J., Miyake H. (2009). A checklist of midwater cnidarians and ctenophores from Japanese waters ‒species sampled during submersible surveys from 1993-2008 with notes on their taxonomy. <em>Kaiyo Monthly.</em> 41(8): 417–438.
page(s): 342; note: (= distinct from C. centripetalis) [details] Available for editors
Present
Inaccurate
Introduced: alien
Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark This species cannot remain in the genus Chiarella as advocated by Kamp (1961). Bipartite tetntacle bulbs are diagnostic for the genus Chiarella and they are not present in this species according to Naumov (1969) [details]