| About | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Specimens | | Distribution | | Checklist | | Stats | | Log in |
Polychaeta name detailsAcromegalomma pacificum (Johansson, 1927)
1774792 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1774792)
unaccepted > superseded combination (superseded subsequent combination. Gil & Nishi did not create this combination)
Species
marine,
recent only
(of Megalomma pacifica Johansson, 1927) Johansson, Karl Eric. (1927). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Polychaeten-Familien Hermellidae Sabellidae und Serpulidae. [inaugural-dissertation]. <em>Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala.</em> 11: 1-184. [details]
Nomenclature Gil & Nishi (2017) deliberately did not create 'Acromegalomma pacificum' because they considered the holotype was likely a...
Nomenclature Gil & Nishi (2017) deliberately did not create 'Acromegalomma pacificum' because they considered the holotype was likely a Parasabella as suggested by Fitzhugh. However, strangely Jimi (2024) in a checklist created the combination although aware of the treatment by Gil & Nishi. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2025). World Polychaeta Database. Acromegalomma pacificum (Johansson, 1927). Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1774792 on 2026-06-05
Date action by
original description
(of Megalomma pacifica Johansson, 1927) Johansson, Karl Eric. (1927). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Polychaeten-Familien Hermellidae Sabellidae und Serpulidae. [inaugural-dissertation]. <em>Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala.</em> 11: 1-184. [details]
basis of record Jimi, Naoto. (2024). The Polychaetous Annelids of Japan: Updated Checklist of Known Species. <em>Species Diversity.</em> 29(2): 337-377., available online at https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/specdiv/29/2/29_SD21-22/_article page(s): 366; note: Against the treatment by Gil & Nishi (2017), in a checklist Jimi (2024) incorrectly created the combination Acromegalomma pacificum, although it is known the holotype is likely a Parasabella. [details] Available for editors  [request]From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Gil & Nishi (2017) deliberately did not create 'Acromegalomma pacificum' because they considered the holotype was likely a Parasabella as suggested by Fitzhugh. However, strangely Jimi (2024) in a checklist created the combination although aware of the treatment by Gil & Nishi. [details]
|