| About | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Specimens | | Distribution | | Checklist | | Stats | | Log in |
Polychaeta taxon detailsPhalacrophorus borealis Reibisch, 1895
338262 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:338262)
accepted
Species
Phalacrophorus pictus borealis Reibisch, 1895 · unaccepted (rank upgrade back to original...)
rank upgrade back to original species rank
marine,
recent only
Reibisch, J.G.F. (1895). Die pelagischen Phyllodociden und Typhloscoleciden der Plankton-Expedition. <em>Ergebnisse der in dem Atlantischen Ocean von Mitte Juli bis Anfang November 1889 ausgeführten Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung.</em> 2.H.c: 1-63, plates I-V., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2130690
page(s): 12, plate 1, figure 8-9 [details]
Note Atlantic Ocean, off Greenland
Type locality Atlantic Ocean, off Greenland [details]
Taxonomy Kolbasova et al (2020) reinstate / validate Phalacrophorus borealis at species level
Taxonomy Kolbasova et al (2020) reinstate / validate Phalacrophorus borealis at species level [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Phalacrophorus borealis Reibisch, 1895. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=338262 on 2024-04-23
Date action by
original description
Reibisch, J.G.F. (1895). Die pelagischen Phyllodociden und Typhloscoleciden der Plankton-Expedition. <em>Ergebnisse der in dem Atlantischen Ocean von Mitte Juli bis Anfang November 1889 ausgeführten Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung.</em> 2.H.c: 1-63, plates I-V., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2130690
page(s): 12, plate 1, figure 8-9 [details] status source Dales, Rodney Phillips; Peter, George. (1972). A synopsis of the pelagic Polychaeta. <em>Journal of Natural History.</em> 6(1): 55-92., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937200770071 page(s): 62; note: follows Tebble (1962, p. 426) in placing P. borealis as a junior synonym of P. pictus because they believe the absence of eyes is not significant. However, this is unlikely to be true for a pelagic w... follows Tebble (1962, p. 426) in placing P. borealis as a junior synonym of P. pictus because they believe the absence of eyes is not significant. However, this is unlikely to be true for a pelagic worm.  [request]  Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
|