| About | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Specimens | | Distribution | | Checklist | | Stats | | Log in |
Polychaeta taxon detailsAnobothrus nataliae Jirkov, 2009
816848 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:816848)
accepted
Species
marine,
recent only
Jirkov, I. A. (2009). Revision of Ampharetidae (Polychaeta) with modified thoracic notopodia. <i>Invertebrate Zoology</i>. 5(2): 111-132 [text date 2008]., available online at https://doi.org/10.15298/invertzool.05.2.03
page(s): 126-127 [details]
Etymology Named after Dr. Natalia Yu. Dnestrovkaja
Etymology Named after Dr. Natalia Yu. Dnestrovkaja [details] Status Chávez-López et al (2025) reject the synonymy of Anobothrus nataliae to Anobothrus paleatus Hilbig, 2000. They state...
Status Chávez-López et al (2025) reject the synonymy of Anobothrus nataliae to Anobothrus paleatus Hilbig, 2000. They state that: "The case of A. nataliae is unique. The holotype and three paratypes were collected in Peru at 891 m depth, while 14 more paratypes were collected in the Yellow Sea at 7–45 m depth (Jirkov 2009: 126). Based on these significant differences in location and depth, it is doubtful that the specimens from Peru and the Yellow Sea belong to the same species. The original description of A. nataliae appears to have been made using all specimens, as it includes ranges of variation, such as the number of paleae (‘22–27 pairs, 25 in holotype’, Jirkov 2009:126). Consequently, identifying morphological differences between the Peruvian and Yellow Sea specimens is challenging, at least until the type material is redescribed. Imajima et al. (2013: 147–148) stated that A. nataliae has papillated rather than smooth tentacles based on their re-examination of the holotype and three paratypes from Peru (specimens held at the P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow, Russia). Considering this, A. nataliae differs primarily from A. paleatus in having ‘a pair of long nephridial papillae’, papillated tentacles and thoracic uncini with 7 denticles in lateral view (Jirkov 2009)." [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2025). World Polychaeta Database. Anobothrus nataliae Jirkov, 2009. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=816848 on 2026-06-14
Date action by
original description
Jirkov, I. A. (2009). Revision of Ampharetidae (Polychaeta) with modified thoracic notopodia. <i>Invertebrate Zoology</i>. 5(2): 111-132 [text date 2008]., available online at https://doi.org/10.15298/invertzool.05.2.03
page(s): 126-127 [details] additional source Sui, Jixing; Li, Xinzheng. (2013). Review of Anobothrus (Polychaeta: Ampharetidae) from China. <em>Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology.</em> 31(3): 632-635., available online at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00343-013-2209-9 page(s): 634; note: records for 4 specimens from the east China Sea [details] Available for editors  [request]source of synonymy Imajima, Minoru; Reuscher, Michael; Fiege, Dieter. 2013. Ampharetidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Japan. Part II: Genera with elevated and modified notopodia. Zootaxa 3647(1): 137–166, available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3647.1.7 page(s): 148 [details] source of synonymy Schüller, Myriam; Jirkov, Igor A. (2013). New Ampharetidae (Polychaeta) from the deep Southern Ocean and shallow Patagonian waters. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 3692(1): 204-237., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3692.1.11 page(s): 234 [details] Available for editors [request]status source Chávez-López, Yessica; Alvestad, Tom; Moore, Jenna M. (2025). A review of Anobothrus Levinsen, 1884, restricted, with reinstatement of Anobothrella Hartman, 1967 and Melythasides Desbruyères, 1978, and redescription of seven species (Annelida, Ampharetidae). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 5601(2): 201-245., available online at https://mapress.com/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5601.2.1 page(s): 230; note: revalidation from former synonymy with Anobothrus paleatus Hilbig, 2000. [details] Available for editors [request]From editor or global species database
Etymology Named after Dr. Natalia Yu. Dnestrovkaja [details]Status Chávez-López et al (2025) reject the synonymy of Anobothrus nataliae to Anobothrus paleatus Hilbig, 2000. They state that: "The case of A. nataliae is unique. The holotype and three paratypes were collected in Peru at 891 m depth, while 14 more paratypes were collected in the Yellow Sea at 7–45 m depth (Jirkov 2009: 126). Based on these significant differences in location and depth, it is doubtful that the specimens from Peru and the Yellow Sea belong to the same species. The original description of A. nataliae appears to have been made using all specimens, as it includes ranges of variation, such as the number of paleae (‘22–27 pairs, 25 in holotype’, Jirkov 2009:126). Consequently, identifying morphological differences between the Peruvian and Yellow Sea specimens is challenging, at least until the type material is redescribed. Imajima et al. (2013: 147–148) stated that A. nataliae has papillated rather than smooth tentacles based on their re-examination of the holotype and three paratypes from Peru (specimens held at the P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow, Russia). Considering this, A. nataliae differs primarily from A. paleatus in having ‘a pair of long nephridial papillae’, papillated tentacles and thoracic uncini with 7 denticles in lateral view (Jirkov 2009)." [details] |
