 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
Porifera taxon detailsDesmacella dendyi Laubenfels, 1936
168300 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:168300)
accepted
Species
Desmacella vestibularis sensu Dendy, 1924 · unaccepted (misidentified)
marine,
recent only
Laubenfels, M.W. de. (1936). A Discussion of the Sponge Fauna of the Dry Tortugas in Particular and the West Indies in General, with Material for a Revision of the Families and Orders of the Porifera. <em>Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication.</em> 467 (Tortugas Laboratory Paper 30) 1-225, pls 1-22.
page(s): 114 [details] Available for editors  [request]
Note New Zealand. De Laubenfels (1936: 114)...
From editor or global species database
Type locality New Zealand. De Laubenfels (1936: 114) erroneously stated that Dendy's (1924) specimen originated in the West Indies, while Dendy's text (p. 345) leaves no doubt that he referred to material from New Zealand. There are further mistakes in De Laubenfels' text, where he described the spicule size of the New Zealand specimen, mixing up the data with Wilson's Tylodesma vestibularis . [details]
Taxonomy De Laubenfels (1936: 114) erected this species on the basis of Dendy's (1924) record of Desmacella vestibularis, which...
Taxonomy De Laubenfels (1936: 114) erected this species on the basis of Dendy's (1924) record of Desmacella vestibularis, which according to him was not conspecific with Wilson's D. vestibularis (as Tylodesma) from the Galapagos. [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Desmacella dendyi Laubenfels, 1936. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=168300 on 2024-04-20
Date action by 2005-07-10 18:05:41Z created db_admin
original description
Laubenfels, M.W. de. (1936). A Discussion of the Sponge Fauna of the Dry Tortugas in Particular and the West Indies in General, with Material for a Revision of the Families and Orders of the Porifera. <em>Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication.</em> 467 (Tortugas Laboratory Paper 30) 1-225, pls 1-22.
page(s): 114 [details] Available for editors [request] original description (of Desmacella vestibularis sensu Dendy, 1924) Dendy, A. (1924). Porifera. Part I. Non-Antarctic sponges. Natural History Report. <em>British Antarctic (Terra Nova) Expedition, 1910 (Zoology).</em> 6 (3): 269-392, pls I-XV. page(s): 345-346 [details]  additional source Kelly, M.; Edwards, A.R.; Wilkinson, M.R.; Alvarez, B.; Cook, S. de C.; Bergquist, P.R.; Buckeridge, St J.; Campbell, H.J.; Reiswig, H.M.; Valentine, C.; Vacelet, J. (2009). Phylum Porifera: sponges. <em>in: Gordon, D.P. (Ed.) (2009). New Zealand inventory of biodiversity: 1. Kingdom Animalia: Radiata, Lophotrochozoa, Deuterostomia.</em> pp. 23-46. [details] Available for editors [request] additional source Bergquist, P.R.; Fromont, P.J. (1988). The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Porifera, Demospongiae, Part 4 Poecilosclerida. <em>New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir.</em> 96: 1-197. page(s): 35 [details] status source (of Desmacella vestibularis sensu Dendy, 1924) Laubenfels, M.W. de. (1936). A Discussion of the Sponge Fauna of the Dry Tortugas in Particular and the West Indies in General, with Material for a Revision of the Families and Orders of the Porifera. <em>Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication.</em> 467 (Tortugas Laboratory Paper 30) 1-225, pls 1-22. [details] Available for editors [request]  Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy De Laubenfels (1936: 114) erected this species on the basis of Dendy's (1924) record of Desmacella vestibularis, which according to him was not conspecific with Wilson's D. vestibularis (as Tylodesma) from the Galapagos. [details]Type locality New Zealand. De Laubenfels (1936: 114) erroneously stated that Dendy's (1924) specimen originated in the West Indies, while Dendy's text (p. 345) leaves no doubt that he referred to material from New Zealand. There are further mistakes in De Laubenfels' text, where he described the spicule size of the New Zealand specimen, mixing up the data with Wilson's Tylodesma vestibularis . [details] |