WoRMS taxon details
original description
Carter, H.J. (1882). New Sponges, Observations on old ones, and a proposed New Group. <em>Annals and Magazine of Natural History.</em> (5) 10(55):106-125. [details]
original description
(of Oceanapiidae van Soest, 1980) Van Soest, R.W.M. (1980). Marine sponges from Curaçao and other Caribbean localities. Part II. Haplosclerida. <i>In</i>: Hummelinck, P.W. & Van der Steen, L.J. (Eds), Uitgaven van de Natuurwetenschappelijke Studiekring voor Suriname en de Nederlandse Antillen. No. 104. <em>Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean Islands.</em> 62 (191): 1-173. [details]
original description
(of Akaidae Alander, 1942) Alander, H. (1942). Sponges from the Swedish west-coast and adjacent waters. <em>Ph.D. Thesis. (University of Lund, H. Struves: Gøteborg).</em> Pp. 1-95, 15 pls. [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Van Soest, R.W.M. (2001). Porifera, <b><i>in</i></b>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification</i>. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 85-103. (look up in IMIS) [details]
status source
Redmond, N.E.; Morrow, C.C.; Thacker, R.W.; Díaz, M.C.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Hajdu, E.; Lôbo-Hajdu, G.; Picton, B.E.; Pomponi, S.A.; Kayal, E.; Collins, A.G. (2013). Phylogeny and Systematics of Demospongiae in Light of New Small-Subunit Ribosomal DNA (18S) Sequences. <em>Integrative and Comparative Biology.</em> 53 (3): 388-415., available online at http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/06/22/icb.ict078 page(s): 397-398, Figure 4 [details] Available for editors [request]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Classification The type species of Phloeodictyon, the type genus of the present family, is P. isodictyiforme (currently Oceaapia isodictyiformis). In their phylogenetic analysis of Haplosclerida, the sequence of this species obtained by Redmond et al. (2013) ended up within a group of Haliclona species. This raises doubt about the status and content of the family. [details]
| |