Porifera taxon details
original description
Duchassaing de Fonbressin, P.; Michelotti, G. (1864). Spongiaires de la mer Caraibe. <em>Natuurkundige verhandelingen van de Hollandsche maatschappij der wetenschappen te Haarlem.</em> 21(2): 1-124, pls I-XXV. page(s): 77; pl XIV fig 1 [details]
basis of record
Parra-Velandia, F.J.; Zea, S.; Van Soest, R.W.M. (2014). Reef sponges of the genus <em>Agelas</em> (Porifera: Demospongiae) from the Greater Caribbean. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 3794(3): 301-344., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3794.3.1 page(s): 316-318 [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Alcolado, P.M. (2002). Catálogo de las esponjas de Cuba. <em>Avicennia.</em> 15: 53-72. page(s): 61 [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Díaz, M.C.; Nuttall, M.; Pomponi, S.A.; Rützler, K.; Klontz, S.; Adams, C.; Hickerson, E.L.; Schmahl, G.P. (2023). An annotated and illustrated identification guide to common mesophotic reef sponges (Porifera, Demospongiae, Hexactinellida, and Homoscleromorpha) inhabiting Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary and vicinities. <em>ZooKeys.</em> 1161: 1-68., available online at https://zoobank.org/4CE0D6C5-C304-4F74-8387-FCC71F8F8AC0 [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Van Soest, R.W.M.; Stone, S.M.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Rützler, K. (1983). Catalogue of the Duchassaing & Michelotti (1864) collection of West Indian sponges (Porifera). <em>Bulletin Zoologisch Museum, Universiteit van Amsterdam.</em> 9 (21): 189-205. page(s): 197 [details]
additional source
Assmann, M.; Van Soest, R.W.M.; Köck, M. (2001). Description of <i>Agelas cerebrum</i>, a new species and re-description of <i>A. dilatata</i> (Porifera). <em>Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington.</em> 114 (2):359-366. page(s): 363-365; fig 2 [details]
From editor or global species database
Synonymy On the suggestion of Assmann et al. (2001), Parra-Velandia et al. (2014) assigned Ectyon flabelliformis Carter, 1882 to the synonymy of this species, but Van Soest et al. (2014) considered this a valid species. [details]
Type material The type material is considered lost (cf. Van Soest et al. 1983). Parra-Velandia et al. (2014) remarked that a neotype was proposed in Assmann et al. (2001), but that is a mistake, no such proposal was made in that paper. [details]
| |