original description
Koçak, A. Ö.; Kemal, M. (2008). Notes on the nomenclature of some genus group names in Arthropoda. <em>Miscellaneous Papers, Centre for Entomological Studies, Ankara.</em> 138, 2. [details] Available for editors
[request]
taxonomy source
Chan, B. K. K.; Dreyer, N.; Gale, A. S.; Glenner, H.; Ewers-Saucedo, C.; Pérez-Losada, M.; Kolbasov, G. A.; Crandall, K. A.; Høeg, J. T. (2021). The evolutionary diversity of barnacles, with an updated classification of fossil and living forms. <em>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> , available online at https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa160 [details]
Present
Inaccurate
Introduced: alien
Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Additional information Fischer, 1884 proposed the genus Temnaspis Fischer, 1884 under the family Poecilasmatidae. However, the name Temnaspis was initially introduced by Lacordaire, 1845 for the beetle family Megalopodidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Polyphaga: Chrysomeloidea: Megalopodidae: Megalopodinae). So this name was replaced by Fischeriella in Jones & Özdikmen, 2008. The name Fischeriella was preoccupied in a taxon of mollusc. Koçak & Kemal, 2008 proposed the name Dianajonesia as the final replacement of Temnaspis and Fischeriella. (From Benny Chan) [details]