AfReMaS banner
About | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Checklist | Stats | Log in

WoRMS taxon details

Corbulidae Lamarck, 1818

248  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:248)

accepted
Family

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

  1. Genus Apachecorbula P. G. Oliver & Vestheim, 2015
  2. Genus Bicorbula P. Fischer, 1887 †
  3. Genus Bothrocorbula Gabb, 1873 †
  4. Genus Caestocorbula É. Vincent, 1910 †
  5. Genus Caryocorbula J. A. Gardner, 1926
  6. Genus Corbulamella Meek & Hayden, 1857 †
  7. Subfamily Corbulinae Lamarck, 1818
    1. Genus Corbula Bruguière, 1797
    2. Genus Pulsidis Ota, 1964 †
    3. Genus Pulsides [sic] † accepted as Pulsidis Ota, 1964 † (unaccepted > misspelling - incorrect subsequent spelling)
  8. Genus Cuneocorbula Cossmann, 1886
  9. Genus Eoursivivas Ota, 1964 †
  10. Subfamily Erodoninae Winckworth, 1932
    1. Genus Erodona Bosc, 1801
    2. Genus Lentidium De Cristofori & Jan, 1832
    3. Genus Panamicorbula Pilsbry, 1932
    4. Genus Potamocorbula Habe, 1955
  11. Genus Ficusocorbula Korobkov, 1954 †
  12. Genus Hexacorbula Olsson, 1932
  13. Genus Juliacorbula Olsson & Harbison, 1953
  14. Genus Jurassicorbula Fürsich, 1981 †
  15. Genus Lhasanella J.-R. Yin & Grant-Mackie, 2005 †
  16. Genus Nipponicorbula Ota, 1964 †
  17. Subfamily Pachydontinae H. E. Vokes, 1945 †
    1. Genus Surobula Zinsmeister, 1988 †
    2. Genus Tenuicorbula Olsson, 1932
    3. Genus Ursirivus H. E. Vokes, 1945 †
    4. Genus Varicorbula U. S. Grant & Gale, 1931
    5. Genus Aloidis Megerle von Mühlfeld, 1811 accepted as Corbula Bruguière, 1797 (unaccepted > junior objective synonym)
    6. Genus Anisocorbula Iredale, 1930 accepted as Corbula (Anisocorbula) Iredale, 1930 represented as Corbula Bruguière, 1797
    7. Genus Azara A. d'Orbigny, 1844 accepted as Erodona Bosc, 1801 (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym)
    8. Subfamily Caryocorbulinae H. E. Vokes, 1945 accepted as Corbulidae Lamarck, 1818
    9. Genus Corbulomya Nyst, 1845 accepted as Lentidium De Cristofori & Jan, 1832
    10. Genus Guianadesma J. P. E. Morrison, 1943 accepted as Anticorbula Dall, 1898 (possible synonym)
    11. Subfamily Lentidiinae H. E. Vokes, 1945 accepted as Erodoninae Winckworth, 1932
    12. Genus Minicorbula T. Habe, 1977 accepted as Corbula (Minicorbula) T. Habe, 1977 represented as Corbula Bruguière, 1797 (unaccepted > superseded rank)
    13. Genus Notocorbula Iredale, 1930 accepted as Corbula (Notocorbula) (Iredale, 1930) represented as Corbula Bruguière, 1797 (superseded combination)
    14. Genus Pacyodon J. E. Gray, 1847 accepted as Erodona Bosc, 1801 (unaccepted > unavailable name, established in synonymy of Erodona Bosc, 1801; attributed to 'Beck MSS')
    15. Subfamily Potamocorbulinae Habe, 1977 accepted as Erodoninae Winckworth, 1932
    16. Genus Solidicorbula T. Habe, 1949 accepted as Corbula Bruguière, 1797 (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym)
    17. Genus Solidocorbula [sic] accepted as Solidicorbula T. Habe, 1949 accepted as Corbula Bruguière, 1797 (misspelling)
    18. Genus Vokesula Stenzel & Twining, 1957 † accepted as Varicorbula U. S. Grant & Gale, 1931 (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym)
    marine, brackish, fresh
    Lamarck, J.B. (1818). [volume 5 of] Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, préséntant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s'y rapportent; precedes d'une Introduction offrant la determination des caracteres essentiels de l'Animal, sa distinction du vegetal et desautres corps naturels, enfin, l'Exposition des Principes fondamentaux de la Zoologie. <em>Paris, Deterville.</em> vol 5: 612 pp., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12886879 [details]   
    Taxonomy Whereas species are easily recognized as members of Corbulidae at the family level, there is no general agreement on their...  
    Taxonomy Whereas species are easily recognized as members of Corbulidae at the family level, there is no general agreement on their arrangement into subfamilies and genera. The only currently (as of 2020) well supported suprageneric group is (Hallan & Anderson, 2013) subfamily Erodoniinae. Regarding the remaining members of the family, Anderson and Roopnarine (2003) accepted 12 genera but wrote “... the rank of these taxa is in flux. Some authors consider most or all to be separate genera, whereas others refer to them as subgenera, particularly of Corbula. (...) A full taxonomic revision must await expanded phylogenetic analyses with broader taxon, geographic, and temporal coverage.” Huber (2015: 839) used subgenera of Corbula and wrote "Undoubtedly, the application of genera by several authors is premature. The proper delineation and composition of genera for Recent marine Corbula requires much more data".

    Conversely Squires & Saul (2004), Mikkelsen & Bieler (2010), Coan & Valentich Scott (2012) and Arruda (2020) treated several genera as valid. The treatment herein accepts genera when there is a reasonable consensus, and leaves in Corbula s.l. those species which have not recently received attention or have been placed inconsistently according to different contemporary authors.  [details]
    MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Corbulidae Lamarck, 1818. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=248 on 2024-08-06
    Date
    action
    by
    2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
    created
    db_admin
    2011-04-30 06:57:51Z
    checked

    Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


    original description Lamarck, J.B. (1818). [volume 5 of] Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, préséntant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s'y rapportent; precedes d'une Introduction offrant la determination des caracteres essentiels de l'Animal, sa distinction du vegetal et desautres corps naturels, enfin, l'Exposition des Principes fondamentaux de la Zoologie. <em>Paris, Deterville.</em> vol 5: 612 pp., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12886879 [details]   

    original description  (of Caryocorbulinae H. E. Vokes, 1945) Vokes H. E. (1945). Supraspecific groups of the pelecypod family Corbulidae. <em>Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History.</em> 86:1–32. [details]   

    context source (PeRMS) Paredes, C.; Cardoso, F.; Santamaría, J.; Esplana, J.; Llaja, L. (2016). Lista anotada de los bivalvos marinos del Perú. <em>Revista peruana de biología.</em> 23(2), 127-150., available online at http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-99332016000200006 [details]   

    basis of record Bouchet, P. & Rocroi, J. P. (2010). Nomenclator of bivalve families; with a classification of bivalve families by R. Bieler, J.G. Carter & E.V. Coan. <em>Malacologia.</em> 52(2): 1-184. [details]   

    redescription Coan, E. V.; Valentich-Scott, P. (2012). Bivalve seashells of tropical West America. Marine bivalve mollusks from Baja California to northern Peru. 2 vols, 1258 pp. [details]   
     
     Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
    From editor or global species database
    Taxonomy Whereas species are easily recognized as members of Corbulidae at the family level, there is no general agreement on their arrangement into subfamilies and genera. The only currently (as of 2020) well supported suprageneric group is (Hallan & Anderson, 2013) subfamily Erodoniinae. Regarding the remaining members of the family, Anderson and Roopnarine (2003) accepted 12 genera but wrote “... the rank of these taxa is in flux. Some authors consider most or all to be separate genera, whereas others refer to them as subgenera, particularly of Corbula. (...) A full taxonomic revision must await expanded phylogenetic analyses with broader taxon, geographic, and temporal coverage.” Huber (2015: 839) used subgenera of Corbula and wrote "Undoubtedly, the application of genera by several authors is premature. The proper delineation and composition of genera for Recent marine Corbula requires much more data".

    Conversely Squires & Saul (2004), Mikkelsen & Bieler (2010), Coan & Valentich Scott (2012) and Arruda (2020) treated several genera as valid. The treatment herein accepts genera when there is a reasonable consensus, and leaves in Corbula s.l. those species which have not recently received attention or have been placed inconsistently according to different contemporary authors.  [details]
        Definitions

    Loading...


    LanguageName 
    Dutch korfschelpen  [details]
    English little basket clamsbox clams  [details]
    German Korbmuscheln  [details]
    Japanese クチベニガイ科  [details]
    Swedish korgmusslor  [details]