About | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Specimens | Distribution | Checklist | Stats | Log in

Polychaeta source details

Grube, A.E. (1872). Über die Gattung Lycastis und ein paar neue Arten derselben. Jahresbericht der Schlesichen Gesellschaft für vaterländische Cultur. 48: 47-48.
Grube, A.E.
Über die Gattung <i>Lycastis</i> und ein paar neue Arten derselben
Jahresbericht der Schlesichen Gesellschaft f&uuml;r vaterl&auml;ndische Cultur
48: 47-48
World Polychaeta Database (WPolyDb). Those that have looked into the matter state that this paper was published 1872 not 1871.
America, South
Systematics, Taxonomy
RIS (EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
BibTex (BibDesk, LaTeX)
2013-01-12 18:30:12Z
2013-10-18 01:17:36Z
2016-01-05 18:52:57Z

Holotype ZMB 3436-Q, geounit Brazil, identified as Lycastis abiuma Grube, 1872

Some writers have added Müller to the authorship, but there is no justification for this. It is a misunderstanding ... [details]

 Depth range

Not stated for type material, probably shallow water.  [details]


Southwestern Atlantic: Brazil (Florianópolis, State of Santa Catarina).  [details]

 Editor's comment

"Paranereis abiuma" as used by Hartman (1959: 163) seems to be a mistaken interpretation, as although Grube does ... [details]

 Editor's comment

Hartman (1959: 163) named "Paranereis abiuma" (correctly Lycastis abiuma) as type species of her new genus ... [details]


Unknown. The etymology of the species was not explained by Grube (1872), and Glasby (1999) was unable to determine it.  [details]


Not stated for type material.  [details]


Senior secondary homonym with Namanereis littoralis Hutchings & Turvey, 1982 [details]

 Type locality

Brazil, State of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina Island, Desterro (= Florianópolis) (geocoordinates not provided, ... [details]

 Type locality

Desterro, now Florianópolis, Santa Catarina Island, Brazil, approx -27.5851, -48.5495 [details]

 Type species

The type species as named by Hartman was as "Paranereis abiuma" Müller in Grube, 1871, but this appears to be a ... [details]