| About | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Specimens | | Distribution | | Checklist | | Stats | | Log in |
Polychaeta name detailsPseudolacydonia Rullier, 1964324600 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:324600)
unaccepted (subjective synonym)
Genus
Pseudolacydonia caeca Rullier, 1964 accepted as Glycerella magellanica (McIntosh, 1885) (type by monotypy)
Species Pseudolacydonia caeca Rullier, 1964 accepted as Glycerella magellanica (McIntosh, 1885) (subjective synonym)
marine,
recent only
Rullier, François. (1964). Résultats scientifiques des campagne de la 'Calypso': Îles du Cap Vert. 5. Annélides polychètes. <em>Annales de l'Institut Océanographique, Paris.</em> 41(6): 113-218.
page(s): 151 [details]
Taxonomy As the name indicates, Pseudolacydonia was first placed in Lacydoniidae alongside Lacydonia. Blake (1994:188) first...
Taxonomy As the name indicates, Pseudolacydonia was first placed in Lacydoniidae alongside Lacydonia. Blake (1994:188) first suggested it was wrongly placed there and referred it informally to the goniadids. Böggemann (2002) examined the type and placed it as a glycerid. [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2021). World Polychaeta Database. Pseudolacydonia Rullier, 1964. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=324600 on 2022-01-22
Date action by
original description
Rullier, François. (1964). Résultats scientifiques des campagne de la 'Calypso': Îles du Cap Vert. 5. Annélides polychètes. <em>Annales de l'Institut Océanographique, Paris.</em> 41(6): 113-218.
page(s): 151 [details] source of synonymy Böggemann, M. (2002). Revision of the Glyceridae Grube 1850 (Annelida: Polychaeta). <em>Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft.</em> 555: 1–249., available online at http://www.schweizerbart.de/publications/list/series/abh_senck page(s): 78 [details] From editor or global species database
Taxonomy As the name indicates, Pseudolacydonia was first placed in Lacydoniidae alongside Lacydonia. Blake (1994:188) first suggested it was wrongly placed there and referred it informally to the goniadids. Böggemann (2002) examined the type and placed it as a glycerid. [details]
|