WoRMS taxon details
original description
(of Tyrinna nobilis Bergh, 1898) Bergh, L. S. R. (1898). Die Opisthobranchier der Sammlung Plate. <em>Zoologische Jahrbücher Supplement.</em> 4(3):481-582, pls. 28-33., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13348266 page(s): 524, pl. 30 figs 21-29, pl. 32 figs 21-24 [details]
original description
(of Doris delicata Abraham, 1877) Abraham, P. S. (1877). Revision of the anthobranchiate nudibranchiate Mollusca with descriptions or notices of forty-one hitherto undescribed species. <em>Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London.</em> 1877: 196-269, pl. 28-30 [August]., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28510784 [details]
original description
(of Chromodoris juvenca Bergh, 1898) Bergh, L. S. R. (1898). Die Opisthobranchier der Sammlung Plate. <em>Zoologische Jahrbücher Supplement.</em> 4(3):481-582, pls. 28-33., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13348266 page(s): 531 [details]
original description
(of Tyrinna pusae Er. Marcus, 1959) Marcus, Er. (1959). Reports from the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948-49, No. 36. Lamellariacea und Opisthobranchia. <em>Lunds Universitets Årsskrift (Ny Följd), Avd. 2.</em> 55(9):1-133. (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors [request]
basis of record
Schrödl M. & Millen S.V. (2001) Revision of the nudibranch gastropod genus <i>Tyrinna</i> Bergh, 1898 (Doridoidea: Chromodorididae). <i>Journal of Natural History</i> 35(8): 1143-1171. [details]
additional source
Araya J.F. & Valdés Á. (2016). Shallow water heterobranch sea slugs (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) from the Región de Atacama, northern Chile. <em>PeerJ.</em> 4: e1963., available online at https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1963 [details]
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature Schrödl & Millen (2001) declared that "Following the new code of nomenclature, retention of the commonly used name T. nobilis instead of its replacement by the senior but disregarded synonym T. delicata is proposed." However, they failed to give the evidence required by Art. 23.9 of the ICZN Code for a reversal of precedence, and their proposal was not Code compliant. Priority must apply. (Philippe Bouchet, 5 Nov. 2010). [details]
| |