WoRMS name details
original description
(of Pyrgula (Oxypyrgula) vinogradovi Logvinenko & Starobogatov, 1969) Logvinenko, B.M.; Starobogatov, Ya.I. (1969 ["1968"]). Mollusca. In: Birshteyn, Ya. A.; Vinogradov, L. G.; Kondakov, N. N.; Kuhn, M. S.; Astakhova, T. V.; Romanova, N. N. (eds.). <em>Atlas bespozvonochnykh Kaspiyskogo morya [Atlas of the Invertebrates of the Caspian Sea].</em> Pishchevaya Promyshlennost (Vsesoyuznyi Nauchno-issledovatel'skii Institut Morskogo Rybnogo Khozyaistva i Okeanografii), Moskva, pp. 308-385. page(s): 368, fig. 363(9) [details]
original description
(of Pyrgula astrachanica Pirogov, 1971) Pirogov, V.V. (1971). On the finding of a new species of molluscs of the genus Pyrgula Crist. et Jan. off the Volga delta [О нахождении нового вида моллюска из рода Pyrgula Crist. et Jan. в авандельте реки Волги]. <em>Trudy Astrakhanskogo Zapovednika imeni V.I. Lenina.</em> 13: 249-253. page(s): 249-251, fig. 1 [details] Available for editors [request]
basis of record
Kantor Yu.I. & Sysoev A.V. (2006) <i>Marine and brackish water Gastropoda of Russia and adjacent countries: an illustrated catalogue.</i> Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. 372 pp. + 140 pls., available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350432257_Marine_and_brackish-water_Gastropoda_of_Russia_and_adjacent_countries_an_illustrated_catalogue [details]
status source
Wesselingh, F. P.; Neubauer, T. A.; Anistratenko, V. V.; Vinarski, M.; Yanina, T.; ter Poorten, J. J.; Kijashko, P.; Albrecht, C.; Anistratenko, O. Y.; D'Hont, A.; Frolov, P.; Gándara, A. M.; Gittenberger, A.; Gogaladze, A.; Karpinsky, M.; Lattuada, M.; Popa, L.; Sands, A. F.; Van de Velde, S.; Vandendorpe, J.; Wilke, T. (2019). Mollusc species from the Pontocaspian region – an expert opinion list. <em>ZooKeys.</em> 827: 31-124., available online at https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.827.31365 page(s): 97 [details] Available for editors [request]
From editor or global species database
Validity The species has been listed as accepted in recent species catalogues, but there is considerable doubt about its validity given the morphological similarity to congeners (see Wesselingh et al. 2019). Until molecular data are available to ascertain its identity, we treat the present species as a nomen dubium. [details]
From editor or global species database
| |