Banner
Intro | About | Wiki | Search traits | Data explorer | Literature | Definitions | Sources | Webservices | Statistics | Feedback | Editors | Log in

Copepoda taxon details

Danielsseniinae Huys & Gee, in Huys, Gee, Moore & Hamond, 1996

582452  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:582452)

accepted
Subfamily
Paranannopidae Por, 1986 · unaccepted (Paranannopidae was relegated to a...)  
Paranannopidae was relegated to a subfamily of the Pseudotachidiidae by Willen (1999, 2000)

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine
Huys, R., J.M. Gee, C.G. Moore & R. Hamond. (1996). Marine and brackish water harpacticoid copepods. Part 1. Keys and notes for identification of the species. <em>In: Barnes, R.S.K. & J.H. Crothers (eds.). Synopses of the British Fauna, New Series, Published for the Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association.</em> 51(1):1-352. (look up in IMIS[details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
Taxonomic remark Taxonomic remark "Huys et al. (1996: 236), building on the non-availability of the generic name Paranannopus Lang, 1936a...  
Taxonomic remark Taxonomic remark "Huys et al. (1996: 236), building on the non-availability of the generic name Paranannopus Lang, 1936a [nomen nudum], introduced the new family name Danielsseniidae to replace Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum], since family-group names taking their stem from an unavailable (and thus invalid) generic name, also become unavailable (ICZN Arts 11.7.1.1 and 63–64). In addition, it was believed at the time that continued use of the family name Paranannopidae would have been preferential for the sake of stability, but would also have the less favourable implication of basing the family on a type genus that (1) is very advanced and not really representative for the family, (2) is mostly known from females only, and (3) misleadingly alludes to a relationship with the genus Nannopus Brady, 1880a, currently placed in the family Huntemanniidae (= Nannopodidae, see below). Alternatively, the second option offered the possibility of designating another genus that is both well known and representative of the family. The family name Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee in Huys et al., 1996 was accompanied by a differential diagnosis (Huys et al. 1996: 236; ICZN Art. 13.1.1) and was based on the available and still valid generic name Danielssenia Boeck, 1873 (ICZN Art. 13.2). Although the family name was not explicitly indicated as intentionally new or accompanied by a citation of the type genus (these provisions only apply to family-group names published after 1999; ICZN Arts. 16.1–2), the family-group name Danielsseniidae is valid. The family Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum] was relegated to a subfamily of the Pseudotachidiidae Lang, 1936c by Willen (1999, 2000); hence at this rank it should be cited as Danielsseniinae Huys & Gee in Huys et al. (1996). Note also that the ending of the generic name Paranannopus is derived from the Greek stem pous (πους), meaning foot, and hence the correct spelling of the family name should have been Paranannopodidae." (after Huys, [details]
Walter, T.C.; Boxshall, G. (2024). World of Copepods Database. Danielsseniinae Huys & Gee, in Huys, Gee, Moore & Hamond, 1996. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/copepoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=582452 on 2024-06-27
Date
action
by
2011-10-17 19:52:46Z
created
2015-09-26 11:38:58Z
changed
2024-06-14 20:22:37Z
changed
2024-06-15 13:16:36Z
changed

original description Huys, R., J.M. Gee, C.G. Moore & R. Hamond. (1996). Marine and brackish water harpacticoid copepods. Part 1. Keys and notes for identification of the species. <em>In: Barnes, R.S.K. & J.H. Crothers (eds.). Synopses of the British Fauna, New Series, Published for the Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association.</em> 51(1):1-352. (look up in IMIS[details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

original description  (of Paranannopinae Por, 1986) Por, F.D. (1986). A re-evaluation of the family Cletodidae Sars, Lang (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). In: Schriever, G., H.K. Schminke & C.-t. Shih (eds.). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Copepoda, Ottawa, Canada, 13-17 August, 1984. Syllogeus 58:420-425. [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

original description  (of Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee, in Huys, Gee, Moore & Hamond, 1996) Huys, R., J.M. Gee, C.G. Moore & R. Hamond. (1996). Marine and brackish water harpacticoid copepods. Part 1. Keys and notes for identification of the species. <em>In: Barnes, R.S.K. & J.H. Crothers (eds.). Synopses of the British Fauna, New Series, Published for the Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association.</em> 51(1):1-352. (look up in IMIS)
page(s): 236 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

original description  (of Paranannopidae Por, 1986) Por, F.D. (1986). A re-evaluation of the family Cletodidae Sars, Lang (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). In: Schriever, G., H.K. Schminke & C.-t. Shih (eds.). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Copepoda, Ottawa, Canada, 13-17 August, 1984. Syllogeus 58:420-425.
page(s): 420 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Taxonomic remark "Huys et al. (1996: 236), building on the non-availability of the generic name Paranannopus Lang, 1936a [nomen nudum], introduced the new family name Danielsseniidae to replace Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum], since family-group names taking their stem from an unavailable (and thus invalid) generic name, also become unavailable (ICZN Arts 11.7.1.1 and 63–64). In addition, it was believed at the time that continued use of the family name Paranannopidae would have been preferential for the sake of stability, but would also have the less favourable implication of basing the family on a type genus that (1) is very advanced and not really representative for the family, (2) is mostly known from females only, and (3) misleadingly alludes to a relationship with the genus Nannopus Brady, 1880a, currently placed in the family Huntemanniidae (= Nannopodidae, see below). Alternatively, the second option offered the possibility of designating another genus that is both well known and representative of the family. The family name Danielsseniidae Huys & Gee in Huys et al., 1996 was accompanied by a differential diagnosis (Huys et al. 1996: 236; ICZN Art. 13.1.1) and was based on the available and still valid generic name Danielssenia Boeck, 1873 (ICZN Art. 13.2). Although the family name was not explicitly indicated as intentionally new or accompanied by a citation of the type genus (these provisions only apply to family-group names published after 1999; ICZN Arts. 16.1–2), the family-group name Danielsseniidae is valid. The family Paranannopidae Por, 1986a [nomen nudum] was relegated to a subfamily of the Pseudotachidiidae Lang, 1936c by Willen (1999, 2000); hence at this rank it should be cited as Danielsseniinae Huys & Gee in Huys et al. (1996). Note also that the ending of the generic name Paranannopus is derived from the Greek stem pous (πους), meaning foot, and hence the correct spelling of the family name should have been Paranannopodidae." (after Huys, [details]
    Definitions

Loading...