| About | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Specimens | | Distribution | | Checklist | | Stats | | Log in |
Polychaeta name detailsSigalion buskii McIntosh, 1876
338368 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:338368)
unaccepted (subjective synonym)
Species
marine,
recent only
McIntosh, W. C. (1876). On British Annelida. Part I. Euphrosynidae, Amphinomidae, Aphroditidae, Polynoidae, Acoetiidae, and Sigalionidae. <em>Transactions of the Zoological Society of London.</em> 9(7): 371-394., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28910942
page(s): 391-392, plate LXX fig. 14 [details] 
Type locality contained in British Isles
type locality contained in British Isles [details]
From editor or global species database
Type locality dredged in 90 fathoms off North Unst, Shetland Islands [details]
Taxonomy McIntosh 1898 maintained that S. buskii was separate from S. squamatum (his error for 'squamosum'). Fauvel (1923: 104)...
Taxonomy McIntosh 1898 maintained that S. buskii was separate from S. squamatum (his error for 'squamosum'). Fauvel (1923: 104) included S. buski under S. squamatum (again a misspelling). Hartman in the catalogue supplement writes "see Sthenolepis tetragona, not Sigalion squamatum", having earlier (1959: 119) referred Sigalion buskii to Sigalion squamatum [sic, S. squamosum delle Chiaje was meant". Muir states the type could not be found but nevertheless synonymizes S. buskii to S. squamosum. According to Aungtonya & Eibye-Jacobsen (2014: the 'squamatum' misspelling arose from Claparede, 1868. Those authors retain the earlier synonymy of Sigalion buskii to Sigalion squamosum, evidently relying on earlier authors rather than making their own assessment for their checklist. Likewise Muir & Chambers (1990) give no details for their continuation of the synonymy [details]
Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Sigalion buskii McIntosh, 1876. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=338368 on 2024-09-22
Date action by
original description
McIntosh, W. C. (1876). On British Annelida. Part I. Euphrosynidae, Amphinomidae, Aphroditidae, Polynoidae, Acoetiidae, and Sigalionidae. <em>Transactions of the Zoological Society of London.</em> 9(7): 371-394., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28910942
page(s): 391-392, plate LXX fig. 14 [details] additional source McIntosh, W.C. [as M'Intosh]. (1885). Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. <em>Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Zoology.</em> 12 (part 34): i-xxxvi, 1-554, pl. 1-55, 1A-39A, & Annelida stations map., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50688426 page(s): 145-146, Pl. XXII fig. 1 [details] source of synonymy Fauvel, P. (1923). Polychètes errantes. Faune de France. <em>Librairie de la Faculte des Sciences. Paris.</em> 5: 1-488., available online at http://www.faunedefrance.org/ page(s): 104; note: synonymy under Sigalion squamatum (sic, should be S. squamosum, now squamosus) [details] source of synonymy Hartman, Olga. (1965). Catalogue of the polychaetous annelids of the world. Supplement 1960-1965 and index. <em>Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation.</em> 23: 1-197., available online at http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll82/id/19573 page(s): 13; note: Hartman in the catalogue supplement writes "see Sthenolepis tetragona, not Sigalion squamatum", having earlier (1959: 119) referred Sigalion buskii to Sigalion squamatum [sic, perhaps S. squamosum del... Hartman in the catalogue supplement writes "see Sthenolepis tetragona, not Sigalion squamatum", having earlier (1959: 119) referred Sigalion buskii to Sigalion squamatum [sic, perhaps S. squamosum delle Chiaje was meant"  [request] status source Muir, Alex I. (1989). Species of the genus Sigalion (Annelida: Polychaeta) reported from north-west European waters, with a note on the authorship of the generic name. <em>Cahiers de Biologie Marine.</em> 30: 339-345. (look up in IMIS) note: Muir states the type could not be found but nevertheless synonymizes S. buskii to S. squamosum. [details] status source McIntosh, W.C. 1898. Notes from the Gatty Marine Laboratory, St. Andrews. No. 19. 1. On some larval stages of Clione limacina, Phips. 2. On Bipinnaria asterigera, M. Sars (larval stage of Luidia). 3. On Lepidonotus wahlbergi Knbg., and its relation to L. clava Mont. 4. On Sigalion squamatum Delle Chiaje, and its relationship with S. mathildae Aud. and Ed., and S. buskii McI. 5. The nemertean in british text-books of zoology. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 2: 103-118. page(s): 113; note: McIntosh maintains that his S. buskii is not a synonym of S. squamosum. [details]  Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Specimen The Natural History Museum, London [details]Taxonomy McIntosh 1898 maintained that S. buskii was separate from S. squamatum (his error for 'squamosum'). Fauvel (1923: 104) included S. buski under S. squamatum (again a misspelling). Hartman in the catalogue supplement writes "see Sthenolepis tetragona, not Sigalion squamatum", having earlier (1959: 119) referred Sigalion buskii to Sigalion squamatum [sic, S. squamosum delle Chiaje was meant". Muir states the type could not be found but nevertheless synonymizes S. buskii to S. squamosum. According to Aungtonya & Eibye-Jacobsen (2014: the 'squamatum' misspelling arose from Claparede, 1868. Those authors retain the earlier synonymy of Sigalion buskii to Sigalion squamosum, evidently relying on earlier authors rather than making their own assessment for their checklist. Likewise Muir & Chambers (1990) give no details for their continuation of the synonymy [details] Type locality dredged in 90 fathoms off North Unst, Shetland Islands [details] |