 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
Porifera name detailsPhloeodictyum
131854 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:131854)
unaccepted (Spelling variation of Phloeodictyon)
Genus
marine,
Lévi, C.; Vacelet, J. (1958). Éponges récoltées dans l'Atlantique oriental par le 'Président Théodore-Tissier' (1955-1956). <em>Revue des Travaux de l'Institut des Pêches maritimes 22 (2).</em> 225-246.
page(s): 241; note: Mistaken use of the genus name is stead of Phloeodictyon. [details] 
Nomenclature It is as yet unclear where the first use of Phloeodictyum was made. The legends of Figs 23 and 24 in Lévi & Vacelet (1958)...
Nomenclature It is as yet unclear where the first use of Phloeodictyum was made. The legends of Figs 23 and 24 in Lévi & Vacelet (1958) bear the name combinations Phoeodictyum coriaceum (Topsent) and Phloeodictyum fistulosum (Bowerbank), but in the text these are given as Phloeodictyon coriaceum and Phloeodictyum fistulosum. This is here pronounced as 'original description' but it is not yet clear which author was the first to make this mistake. The Systema Porifera has no entry for this name in the index, but a mistaken use of the name Phloeodictyum appears at least in the legend to Fig. 1 of the chapter on Iotrochotidae (van Soest, 2002). Similarly, the name was used once in synonymy quotations (Oceanapia constructum (Rützler, 1965 as Phloeodictyum in the ERMS report (Costello et al. 2001), a clear mistake as Rützler used Phloeodictyum. For a time the Greek suffix '-on' was treated as a nomen corrigendum and changed to the Latin '-um'; however, this practice was declared unlawful and abandoned in the beginning of the 20th century. [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2025). World Porifera Database. Phloeodictyum. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=131854 on 2025-05-11
Date action by
original description
Lévi, C.; Vacelet, J. (1958). Éponges récoltées dans l'Atlantique oriental par le 'Président Théodore-Tissier' (1955-1956). <em>Revue des Travaux de l'Institut des Pêches maritimes 22 (2).</em> 225-246.
page(s): 241; note: Mistaken use of the genus name is stead of Phloeodictyon. [details] basis of record Van Soest, R.W.M. (2001). Porifera, <b><i>in</i></b>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification</i>. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 85-103. (look up in IMIS) [details] From editor or global species database
Nomenclature It is as yet unclear where the first use of Phloeodictyum was made. The legends of Figs 23 and 24 in Lévi & Vacelet (1958) bear the name combinations Phoeodictyum coriaceum (Topsent) and Phloeodictyum fistulosum (Bowerbank), but in the text these are given as Phloeodictyon coriaceum and Phloeodictyum fistulosum. This is here pronounced as 'original description' but it is not yet clear which author was the first to make this mistake. The Systema Porifera has no entry for this name in the index, but a mistaken use of the name Phloeodictyum appears at least in the legend to Fig. 1 of the chapter on Iotrochotidae (van Soest, 2002). Similarly, the name was used once in synonymy quotations (Oceanapia constructum (Rützler, 1965 as Phloeodictyum in the ERMS report (Costello et al. 2001), a clear mistake as Rützler used Phloeodictyum.For a time the Greek suffix '-on' was treated as a nomen corrigendum and changed to the Latin '-um'; however, this practice was declared unlawful and abandoned in the beginning of the 20th century. [details] |