 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
Porifera taxon detailsSuberites luetkenii Schmidt, 1870
134294 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:134294)
accepted
Species
marine,
recent only
Schmidt, O. (1870). Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): iii-iv, 1-88, pls I-VI.
page(s): 47, plate V fig 7 [details] 
Type locality contained in North Sea
type locality contained in North Sea [details]
Taxonomic remark Morozov et al. (2023) assigned Schmidt's original material to a species complex, involving S. montalbidus Carter, 1880 and...
Taxonomic remark Morozov et al. (2023) assigned Schmidt's original material to a species complex, involving S. montalbidus Carter, 1880 and S. domuncula ficus sensu Koltun (1959) (not sensu Johnston, 1841). The authors also erected a variety lanata but this is unavailable for lack of explicit indication as a new taxon (ICZN 16.1), type specimen not selected (ICZN 16.4) and for infrasubspecific rank (ICZN 15.2). Until the status has been cleared we refrain from adding specimen and occurrence data provided by the authors. In a later paper (Morozov et al. 2025), the authors having obtained molecular sequence data, no longer considered S. luetkenii a complex and they apparently withdrew (though not explicltly) their new variety. [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2025). World Porifera Database. Suberites luetkenii Schmidt, 1870. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=134294 on 2026-02-25
Date action by
original description
Schmidt, O. (1870). Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. (Wilhelm Engelmann: Leipzig): iii-iv, 1-88, pls I-VI.
page(s): 47, plate V fig 7 [details] basis of record Morozov, G.; Ereskovsky, A.; Strelkova, N. (2025). Deciphering Arctic sponge diversity: genetic and morphological evidence reveals cryptic lineages in <i>Suberites</i>. <em>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> 204, (2) zlaf052: 1-14., available online at https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaf052 page(s): 6 [details] Available for editors  [request]additional source Van Soest, R.W.M. (2001). Porifera, <b><i>in</i></b>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification</i>. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 85-103. (look up in IMIS) [details] status source Morozov, G.; Strelkova, N.A.; Zimina, O.; Sabirov, R. (2023). A preliminary account of the Arctic/Subarctic <i>Suberites</i> (Porifera: Demospongiae) fauna. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 5357(1): 50-70., available online at https://www-mapress-com.ezproxy.its.uu.se/zt/article/view/zootaxa.5357.1.2 page(s): 51 [details] Available for editors [request] Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Spelling Originally spelled incorrectly as S. lütkenii the species naem is corrected to S.luetkenii according to ICZN 32.5.2.1. A further incorrect subsequent spelling S.lutkenii (see e.g. Morozov et al. 2023) is also to be corrected to S. luetkenii. These incorrect spellings are not separately listed. [details]Taxonomic remark Morozov et al. (2023) assigned Schmidt's original material to a species complex, involving S. montalbidus Carter, 1880 and S. domuncula ficus sensu Koltun (1959) (not sensu Johnston, 1841). The authors also erected a variety lanata but this is unavailable for lack of explicit indication as a new taxon (ICZN 16.1), type specimen not selected (ICZN 16.4) and for infrasubspecific rank (ICZN 15.2). Until the status has been cleared we refrain from adding specimen and occurrence data provided by the authors. In a later paper (Morozov et al. 2025), the authors having obtained molecular sequence data, no longer considered S. luetkenii a complex and they apparently withdrew (though not explicltly) their new variety. [details] |
