Ophiuroidea source details

Clarke, Andrew; Johnston, Nadine M. (2003). Antarctic marine benthic diversity. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review. 41: 47-114.
4179
Clarke, Andrew; Johnston, Nadine M
2003
Antarctic marine benthic diversity
Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review
41: 47-114
Publication
An unpublished species checklist compiled for background to this paper by the two authors was later used as basis for the Register of Antarctic Marine Species. The review article itself contains no species lists. The journal series is available at https://www.routledge.com but there is no link to the article. The original spreadsheet checklist might be obtainable from the author, accl@bas.ac.uk
Ant'Phipoda Literature database.
Available for editors  PDF available
Species lists have been compiled for all the major groups of Southern Ocean benthic marine invertebrates, eliminating synonymies where possible and providing a subjective estimate of completeness and reliability for each group. Antarctic marine diversity (pelagic and benthic) is relatively high at the phylum and class level, with the gaps mostly comprising minor, meiofaunal or parasitic groups. Most benthic diversity data come from the continental shelves, with relatively few samples from deeper water. Even for the continental shelves, however, sampling is highly patchy with some areas hardly investigated at all. Over 4100 benthic species have been reported from the Southern Ocean, with the most speciose groups being polychaetes, gastropods and amphipods. Comparison with tropical and temperate regions suggest that decapods, bivalves and teleost fishes are poorly represented in the Southern Ocean benthic marine fauna, whereas pycnogonids, echinoderms and many suspension feeding groups are rich and diverse. Some groups that are currently low in diversity were previously well represented in the Antarctic shallow water marine fauna, notably decapods and many fishes. Other groups have undergone marked radiations in the Southern Ocean, including pycnogonids, amphipods, isopods and teleost fishes; in all cases, however, it is only some lineages that have diversified. This indicates that evolutionary questions concerning the origin, diversification or extinction of the Southern Ocean marine fauna will have no single answer; the evolutionary history of each group appears to reflect a different response to the tectonic, climatic and oceanographic changes to which they have been subject through history. The disposition of southern hemisphere continents makes it difficult to assess whether there is a latitudinal cline in shallow-water marine diversity to mirror that known from the northern hemisphere. Within Antarctica, many species appear to have circumpolar distributions, and the long established biogeographical division into continental Antarctic, Antarctic Peninsula and sub-Antarctic regions have not been challenged by recent sampling. For most groups the frequency distribution of species per genus ratios is typical, though none is well described by the predictions from current evolutionary or null models. Where data are available, size spectra indicate that many Southern Ocean taxa are small, a few spectacular examples of gigantism notwithstanding, and species abundance plots are normal. Knowledge of the Southern Ocean benthic marine fauna has reached a stage where we can now ask powerful evolutionary questions, and the development of new molecular techniques provides the mechanism for answering them
Antarctic
Fauna and Flora, Faunistic inventories, Checklists, Catalogues
RIS (EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
BibTex (BibDesk, LaTeX)
Date
action
by
2013-01-12 18:30:12Z
created
db_admin
2014-02-09 21:01:17Z
changed
2014-02-10 00:57:53Z
changed
2019-05-29 14:31:21Z
changed
2024-01-17 21:45:47Z
changed

Amphiodia Verrill, 1899 (basis of record)
Amphiodia affinis (Studer, 1885) accepted as Amphioplus affinis (Studer, 1885) (basis of record)
Amphiodia destinata Koehler, 1922 accepted as Amphiura joubini Koehler, 1912 (basis of record)
Amphiophiura gibbosa Mortensen, 1936 (basis of record)
Amphiophiura inops (Koehler, 1907) (basis of record)
Amphiophiura relegata Koehler, 1922 accepted as Ophioplinthus relegata (Koehler, 1922) (basis of record)
Amphiophiura rowetti G.A. Smith, 1923 (basis of record)
Amphioplus acutus Mortensen, 1936 accepted as Amphiura acuta (Mortensen, 1936) (basis of record)
Amphioplus peregrinator (Koehler, 1912) (basis of record)
Amphiura (Amphiura) angularis Lyman, 1879 (basis of record)
Amphiura algida Koehler, 1911 (basis of record)
Amphiura belgicae Koehler, 1900 (basis of record)
Amphiura caparti Cherbonnier, 1962 (basis of record)
Amphiura deficiens Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Amphiura dilatata Lyman, 1879 accepted as Amphiura (Amphiura) atlantica Ljungman, 1867 (basis of record)
Amphiura dilatata gaussi Hertz, 1927 (basis of record)
Amphiura eugeniae Ljungman, 1867 (basis of record)
Amphiura joubini Koehler, 1912 (basis of record)
Amphiura lymani Studer, 1885 represented as Amphiura (Amphiura) lymani Studer, 1885 (basis of record)
Amphiura microplax Mortensen, 1936 (basis of record)
Amphiura microplax disjuncta Mortensen, 1936 (basis of record)
Amphiura microplax var. disjuncta Mortensen, 1936 represented as Amphiura microplax disjuncta Mortensen, 1936 (basis of record)
Amphiura monorima Mortensen, 1936 (basis of record)
Amphiura proposita Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Amphiura protecta Hertz, 1927 (basis of record)
Anophiura H.L. Clark, 1939 (basis of record)
Anophiura banzarei Madsen, 1967 (basis of record)
Astrochlamys Koehler, 1912 (basis of record)
Astrochlamys bruneus Koehler, 1912 (basis of record)
Astrochlamys sol Mortensen, 1936 (basis of record)
Astrohamma Döderlein, 1930 (basis of record)
Astrohamma tuberculatum (Koehler, 1923) (basis of record)
Astrotoma Lyman, 1875 (basis of record)
Astrotoma agassizii Lyman, 1875 (basis of record)
Euvondrea Fell, 1961 (basis of record)
Euvondrea floretta Fell, 1961 (basis of record)
Glaciacantha Fell, 1961 (basis of record)
Glaciacantha doederleini (Hertz, 1927) (basis of record)
Glaciacantha dubium (Koehler, 1901) (basis of record)
Gorgonocephalus chilensis (Philippi, 1858) (basis of record)
Ophiacantha antarctica (Lyman, 1879) sensu Mortensen, 1936 accepted as Ophiolimna antarctica (Lyman, 1879) (basis of record)
Ophiacantha antarctica disjuncta Castillo-Alarcon, 1967 accepted as Ophiacantha disjuncta (Koehler, 1911) accepted as Ophiacantha antarctica Koehler, 1900 (basis of record)
Ophiacantha disjuncta (Koehler, 1911) accepted as Ophiacantha antarctica Koehler, 1900 (basis of record)
Ophiacantha drygalskii (Hertz, 1927) accepted as Ophiocamax drygalskii Hertz, 1927 (basis of record)
Ophiacantha frigida Koehler, 1907 (basis of record)
Ophiacantha paramedea Hertz, 1927 (basis of record)
Ophiacantha pentactis Mortensen, 1936 accepted as Ophiosabine pentactis (Mortensen, 1936) (basis of record)
Ophiacantha sollicita Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Ophiacantha vivipara Ljungman, 1871 accepted as Ophiosabine vivipara (Ljungman, 1871) (basis of record)
Ophiactis amator Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Ophiocamax drygalskii Hertz, 1927 (basis of record)
Ophiocamax gigas Koehler, 1900 (basis of record)
Ophioceres Koehler, 1922 accepted as Ophioplocus Lyman, 1861 (basis of record)
Ophioceres incipiens Koehler, 1922 accepted as Ophioplocus incipiens (Koehler, 1922) (basis of record)
Ophiocten amitinum Lyman, 1878 (basis of record)
Ophiocten banzarei Madsen, 1967 (basis of record)
Ophiocten bisquamatum Mortensen, 1936 (basis of record)
Ophiocten dubium Koehler, 1901 accepted as Glaciacantha dubium (Koehler, 1901) (basis of record)
Ophiocten megaloplax Koehler, 1900 (basis of record)
Ophiocten ultimum Hertz, 1927 (basis of record)
Ophiodaces Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Ophiodaces inanis Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Ophiogona Studer, 1876 (basis of record)
Ophiogona doderleini (Koehler, 1901) accepted as Ophiogona doederleini (Koehler, 1901) (basis of record)
Ophiolebella Mortensen, 1936 (basis of record)
Ophiolebella biscutifera (G.A. Smith, 1923) (basis of record)
Ophioleuce Koehler, 1904 (basis of record)
Ophioleuce regulare (Koehler, 1901) (basis of record)
Ophiolimna antarctica (Lyman, 1879) (basis of record)
Ophiomages Koehler, 1923 (basis of record)
Ophiomages cristatus Koehler, 1923 (basis of record)
Ophiomastus Lyman, 1878 (basis of record)
Ophiomastus australis (Koehler, 1901) accepted as Ophiopyrgus australis Koehler, 1901 (basis of record)
Ophiomastus bispinosus Mortensen, 1925 (basis of record)
Ophiomastus conveniens Koehler, 1923 (basis of record)
Ophiomastus ludwigi Koehler, 1900 (basis of record)
Ophiomastus molinae Castillo-Alárcon, 1968 (basis of record)
Ophiomastus primula Hertz, 1927 (basis of record)
Ophiomastus serratus (Mortensen, 1936) (basis of record)
Ophiomitrella falklandica Mortensen, 1936 accepted as Ophiomitrella conferta (Koehler, 1922) accepted as Ophiosemnotes conferta (Koehler, 1922) (basis of record)
Ophionotus Bell, 1902 (basis of record)
Ophionotus hexactis (E. A. Smith, 1876) (basis of record)
Ophionotus victoriae Bell, 1902 (basis of record)
Ophioperla Koehler, 1912 (basis of record)
Ophioperla koehleri (Bell, 1908) (basis of record)
Ophioplinthus Lyman, 1878 (basis of record)
Ophioplinthus brevirima (Mortensen, 1936) (basis of record)
Ophioplinthus brucei (Koehler, 1907) (basis of record)
Ophioplocus Lyman, 1861 (basis of record)
Ophioplocus incipiens (Koehler, 1922) (basis of record)
Ophioscolex nutrix Mortensen, 1936 accepted as Ophiolycus nutrix (Mortensen, 1936) (basis of record)
Ophiosparte Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Ophiosparte gigas Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Ophiosteira Bell, 1902 (basis of record)
Ophiosteira antarctica Bell, 1902 (basis of record)
Ophiosteira bullivanti Fell, 1961 (basis of record)
Ophiosteira debitor Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Ophiosteira echinulata Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Ophiosteira rotundata Koehler, 1922 (basis of record)
Ophiosteira senouqui Koehler, 1912 accepted as Ophiuroglypha carinifera (Koehler, 1901) (basis of record)
 Authority

Author uncertain [details]

 Authority

(Kinberg, 1866) according to RAMS [details]

 Authority

Monniot & Monniot, 1982 [details]

 Authority

RAMS gives this species (Kroyer, 1856) as author [details]

 Authority

Described by Lyman in 1882 [details]

 Authority

(Keferstein, 1863) is mentioned in RAMS [details]

 Authority

RAMS mentions Ehlers, 1875 as author [details]

 Authority

Gambi et al., 1997 found 2 not yet described species: "sp.1" and "sp.2" [details]

 Authority

Ehlers, 1897 according to RAMS [details]

 Authority

Schmarda, 1861 according to RAMS [details]

 Authority

Ehlers, 1874 according to RAMS [details]

 Authority

Mentioned as Kinberg, 1866a in RAMS [details]

 Authority

The authors are uncertain about the authority [details]

 Classification

Member of the family Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

According to RAMS, the genus Anoplodactylus belongs to the Pycnogonidae family instead of the Phoxichilidiidae family. [details]

 Classification

Member of the family Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

According to RAMS, the genus Ascothorax belongs to the Synagogidae family instead of the Ascothoracidae family. [details]

 Classification

According to RAMS, the genus Balanus belongs to the Bathylasmatidae family instead of the Balanidae family. [details]

 Classification

Listed under family Pyuridae [details]

 Classification

Member of the family Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

Placed under Subfamily Coninae [details]

 Classification

According to RAMS, the genus Coronula belongs to the Bathylasmatidae family instead of the Coronulidae family. [details]

 Classification

According to RAMS, the family Ctenosculidae belongs to the Cirripedia infraclass instead of the Ascothoracida ... [details]

 Classification

Member of the family Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

According to RAMS, the family Dendrogastridae belongs to the Cirripedia infraclass instead of the Ascothoracida ... [details]

 Classification

Under Subfamily Cioninae [details]

 Classification

Considered to belong to the Family Munnopsidae [details]

 Classification

Genus Escharella is considered by RAMS to belong to the FamilyExochellidae [details]

 Classification

The Genus Escharoides is considered bt RAMS to belong to the Family Exochellidae [details]

 Classification

Considered to belong to the Family Munnopsidae [details]

 Classification

Considered by RAMS to belong to the Family Exochellidae [details]

 Classification

Member of the family Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

Member of the family Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

Considered to belong to the family Munnopsidae [details]

 Classification

Member of the family Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

Listed under Dimeatidae in Clarke & Johnston (2003). [details]

 Classification

Belongs to the family Arcturidae accoring to RAMS [details]

 Classification

According to RAMS, the genus Pallenopsis belongs to the Callipallenidae; in the printed version of ERMS, the genus is ... [details]

 Classification

Belongs to family Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

Placed in family Plicatocrinidae by Clarke & Johnston (2003). [details]

 Classification

belongs to familt Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

Considered to belong to the Family Munnopsidae [details]

 Classification

According to RAMS, the family Synagogidae belongs to the Cirripedia infraclass instead of the Ascothoracida infraclass. [details]

 Classification

Considered to belong to the Family Munnopsidae [details]

 Classification

Belongs to family Arcturidae according to RAMS [details]

 Classification

According to RAMS, the genus Xenobalanus belongs to the Bathylasmatidae family instead of the Coronulidae family. [details]

 Identification

cf. loveni Malmgren, 1865 [details]

 Identification

The authors are uncertain about the Species [details]

 Spelling
 for Actiniaria

Actinaria [details]

 Spelling

Actinidae [details]

 Spelling

Actinoschyphiidae [details]

 Spelling

Spelled as Alyconidum eightsi in RAMS [details]

 Spelling

Spelled as Amphlibestrum inermis in RAMS [details]

 Spelling

Spelles as Amphiporus gerlachi in RAMS [details]

 Spelling

Referred to by RAMS as Biemna chiliensis[details]

 Spelling

Spelled as Camploplites retiformis in RAMS [details]

 Spelling

Also spelled Cerebratulus malvidi in RAMS [details]

 Spelling

Referred to by RAMS as Coelosphaera appendiculata[details]

 Spelling

In RAMS spelled as Cymodocea australis [details]

 Spelling

commonly misspelled as Dendrophyllidae [details]

 Spelling

Referred to by RAMS as Desmacidon ramosa and by Uriz as Desmacidon ramosus, but corrected for gender of genus name. [details]

 Spelling

Referred to by RAMS as Dolichocantha macrodon[details]

 Spelling

Clarke & Johnston's (2003) list of Antarctic sponges misspelled the (sub-)genus name Ectyomyxilla as Ectomyxilla, ... [details]

 Spelling

This Genus is also spelled Frontoserolils in RAMS [details]

 Spelling

Gorgonidae [details]

 Spelling

Spelled Harmothoe (Harmathoe) spinosa in RAMS [details]

 Spelling

Spelled Herdmadion in RAMS [details]

 Spelling

In RAMS, this species is spelled "Herdmadion magalhaensi" [details]

 Spelling

Jathrippa [details]

 Spelling

Kophobelemnonidae [details]

 Spelling

As far as is known the genus misspelling 'Leospira' exists only in an unpublished checklist associated with the ... [details]

 Spelling

Referred to by RAMS as Leucoselenia[details]

 Spelling

Referred to by RAMS as Leucoselenia discoveryi[details]

 Spelling

Mogula pedunculata in RAMS checklist [details]

 Spelling

listed as Mogula robini [details]

 Spelling

in RAMS spelled as M. longircollaris [details]

 Spelling

Spelled in RAMS as Pseudoscalibregmida bransfieldia [details]

 Spelling

In RAMS spelled as S.( Leodamus) marginatus mcleani [details]

 Spelling

In RAMS spelled as S. (Leodamus) ohlini [details]

 Spelling

Also spelled T. maikenensis in RAMS [details]

 Spelling

Umbellula thomsonii [details]

 Taxonomy

Belongs to Prosorhochmidae according to RAMS [details]

 Taxonomy

A species named A. nr. hastulifera was described by (Fauvel, 1936) in RAMS [details]

 Taxonomy

RAMS also mentions a species Autolutus cf. maclearanus [details]

 Taxonomy

RAMS also mentions a species Autolytus cf. simplex [details]

 Taxonomy

Hooper (2002) and Van Soest (2002) in the same volume assign Bipocillopsis as a junior synonym to different genera ... [details]

 Taxonomy

Belongs to Lineidae accoriding to RAMS [details]

 Taxonomy

Gambi et al., 1997 mentions two not yet described species: sp. 1 and sp. 2 [details]

 Taxonomy

Referred to by RAMS as Geodinella, which is a junior genus name for Geodia according to a checklist provided by Rob ... [details]

 Taxonomy

The genus Leodora is placed under Serpulidae according to RAMS [details]

 Taxonomy

Classified under Iphitimidae [details]

 Taxonomy

Was under Iphitimidae. Palpiphitime is best treated as a species group within Ophyrotrocha according to Wiklund et ... [details]

 Taxonomy

This Genus is placed under Serpulidae in RAMS [details]

 Taxonomy

This genus belongs to Lineidae according to RAMS [details]

 Taxonomy

RAMS also mentions a species Pionosyllis cf. comosa [details]

 Taxonomy

(Hartman, 1978) mentions 3 not yet described species: sp.A, sp. B and sp. C [details]

 Taxonomy

RAMS mentions also a species Sphaerosyllis cf. tetralix[details]

 Taxonomy

Referred to by RAMS as Monosyringa, which is a junior synonym. [details]

 Validity

Author is not sure about Genus name [details]

 Validity

Kinberg, 1855 is mentioned in RAMS Checklists but actual publication date of that work was 1856 [details]


Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-10-15 18:15:56+02:00 · Contact: Sabine Stöhr