Ostracoda name details
Chlamydotheca barbadensis nicoi Martens, 1994
1661227 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1661227)
unaccepted > nomen oblitum
Subspecies
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark The combination was raised for a subspecies that never existed, assumed by the authors to be Chlamydotheca barbadensis...
Taxonomic remark The combination was raised for a subspecies that never existed, assumed by the authors to be Chlamydotheca barbadensis dispar Broodbakker, 1984 - when in reality that work merely discussed the already existing Chlamydotheca barbadensis dispar Triebel, 1961. [details]
Brandão, S.N.; Antonietto, L.S; Nery, D.G.; Pereira, J.S.; Praxedes, R.A.; Santos, S.G.; Karanovic, I. (2024). World Ostracoda Database. Chlamydotheca barbadensis nicoi Martens, 1994. Accessed at: https://www.marinespecies.org/ostracoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1661227 on 2024-05-18
Date
action
by
taxonomy source
Broodbakker, N.W. (1984). The distribution and zoogeography of freshwater Ostracoda (Crustacea) in the West Indies, with emphasis on species inhabiting wells. <em>Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde.</em> 54(1):25-50., available online at https://brill.com/view/journals/btd/54/1/article-p25_3.xml? [details] Available for editors 
[request]
new combination reference Martens, K. & Behen, F. (1994). A checklist of the Recent non-marine ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from the inland waters of South America and adjacent islands. <em>Travaux Scientifiques du Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle de Luxembourg.</em> 22, 1-84., available online at https://ps.mnhn.lu/ferrantia/publications/T.S.22.pdf [details] Available for editors [request]
[request] new combination reference Martens, K. & Behen, F. (1994). A checklist of the Recent non-marine ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from the inland waters of South America and adjacent islands. <em>Travaux Scientifiques du Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle de Luxembourg.</em> 22, 1-84., available online at https://ps.mnhn.lu/ferrantia/publications/T.S.22.pdf [details] Available for editors
[request] From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark The combination was raised for a subspecies that never existed, assumed by the authors to be Chlamydotheca barbadensis dispar Broodbakker, 1984 - when in reality that work merely discussed the already existing Chlamydotheca barbadensis dispar Triebel, 1961. [details]
