WoRMS name details

Desmophyes imbricata Haeckel, 1888

746176  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:746176)

 unaccepted > nomen nudum
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Haeckel, E. (1888). Report on the Siphonophorae. <em>Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Zoology.</em> 28 (part 77): i-viii, 1-380, pl. 1-50., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/3155485
page(s): 169 [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Status This species is inadequately described as it disintegrated before Haeckel could describe it, though he says the bracts...  
Status This species is inadequately described as it disintegrated before Haeckel could describe it, though he says the bracts resemble those of Praya galea, now regarded as conspecific with Rosacea cymbiformis (Mapstone 2005). [details]
Schuchert, P. (2024). World Hydrozoa Database. Desmophyes imbricata Haeckel, 1888. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=746176 on 2024-05-17
Date
action
by
2014-01-02 11:02:58Z
created
2015-07-27 11:18:34Z
changed
2015-08-06 06:44:13Z
changed
2019-10-07 14:04:08Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Haeckel, E. (1888). Report on the Siphonophorae. <em>Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Zoology.</em> 28 (part 77): i-viii, 1-380, pl. 1-50., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/3155485
page(s): 169 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

original description (unavailable nomenclaturally) Haeckel, E. (1888). System der Siphonophoren auf phylogenetischer Grundlage entworfen. <em>Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft.</em> 22: 1-46., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12007523
page(s): 36; note: Nomen nudum [details]  OpenAccess publication 
From editor or global species database
Status This species is inadequately described as it disintegrated before Haeckel could describe it, though he says the bracts resemble those of Praya galea, now regarded as conspecific with Rosacea cymbiformis (Mapstone 2005). [details]